User talk:AnonLionCavalier83
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 2026
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hindu American Foundation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please do not remove content without proper explanation. if you contest the inclusion, bring it to the talk page first Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:01, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- It wasn't unconstructive and I didn't mean to vandalize. I removed "and Muslims" part since, if I recall correctly, the anti-conversion laws were aimed mainly at Christians. I am sorry.
- (Completely unrelated, but nice userpage. Really love that part about Rahul Gandhi.) ~ AnonLionCavalier83 (talk) 04:35, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hey no worries at all! Thanks for clarifying. Yes I agree to an extent but there are couple of reliable sources talking about its impact on Muslims. Please be mindful to first fact check the sources before removing content, in the future.. instead of simply going by assumptions. Also I know I am guilty of the same but please try adding an edit summary when making such edits, so that others are aware.
- also btw, really cool infobox you got there :) and thanks Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:53, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
- Got it. ~ AnonLionCavalier83 (talk) 05:08, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 02:08, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
Thangjing deity origin
Your recent edits in Thangching & Thangjing Hill have been removed because those include controversial themes. I have opened a thread in Talk:Thangching, where you are welcomed to express your opinions and claims, along with reliable sources, if in case you don't agree with the long standing facts in the articles. And also please refrain from engaging in edit warring in those pages. FYI, long standing facts are kept status quo before getting consensus in discussion, in case of disagreements. Haoreima (talk) 14:16, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
- Why did you remove the message I left for you in your talk page? ~ AnonLionCavalier83 (talk) 17:28, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Is there a need to keep it forever? Haoreima (talk) 17:35, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Yes. To warn people of not to personally attack.
- I don't remove any warnings for me here. I've even archived it so you can see. ~ AnonLionCavalier83 (talk) 17:37, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- You said you opened a thread to "express.. ..opinions and claims, along with reliable sources" yet you went against what you stated[1] and edited anyway.[2]
- This would be different if a new user did it, but the fact that a Administrator of Meitei Wikipedia[3] used personal attacks and slander is insane, that again, against multiple users. ~ AnonLionCavalier83 (talk) 18:23, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- I removed your edited claim from the article because it was not sourced at that time. If sourced, I won't. Check each of my edit history. Haoreima (talk) 18:31, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- That's not the problem. The problem is you using personal attacks and slander. ~ AnonLionCavalier83 (talk) 18:35, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Report me to an admin, if you feel it's bad. Haoreima (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- It's okay I forgive you. Just avoid personal attacks and slander. I won't report you. ~ AnonLionCavalier83 (talk) 18:48, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Report me to an admin, if you feel it's bad. Haoreima (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- That's not the problem. The problem is you using personal attacks and slander. ~ AnonLionCavalier83 (talk) 18:35, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- I removed your edited claim from the article because it was not sourced at that time. If sourced, I won't. Check each of my edit history. Haoreima (talk) 18:31, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- Is there a need to keep it forever? Haoreima (talk) 17:35, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

