User talk:Axeluhl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is Axeluhl's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: SAP Sailing Analytics (August 27)
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SAP Sailing Analytics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Axeluhl!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hammersoft (talk) 02:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: SAP Sailing Analytics (August 28)
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
The comment the reviewer left was:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
This draft needs some major rewriting. I looked through all the references and I had to remove 10 references because they were totally unrelated to this draft's subject or because they referred to sources that don't qualify as Wikipedia sources. The remaining 22 references refer to sources that hardly indicate why Wikipedia would have an article on the topic. Various sources are WP:SIRS-compliant, i.e., they could be used to demonstrate why the topic is notable, however, I have doubts about some of these, and all sources that could indicate notability are topic-specific sources. Topic-specific sources are generally less suited for establishing notability. Nonetheless, additional WP:SIRS-compliant sources could help demonstrating the topic's notability.
The draft's tone is mostly okay and the text has only few grammar mistakes, but it's obvious that it was composed by a native German speaker.
The technology section remains largely unreferenced and needs some additional sources before the draft can be accepted. Note that Google Play and the AppStore don't qualify as sources for Wikipedia. The overall sourcing situation is also not good. 5/22 sources fail the WP:CTRL+F-test, 4/22 sources contain nothing more than passing mentions, 6/22 sources are obvious press releases, 3/22 sources are very likely SIRS-compliant, and 3/22 sources could be SIRS-compliant, but I have doubts, and 1/22 sources cannot be assessed due to a paywall. The sourcing needs significant improving before this can be accepted.
- Seahorsemagazine (1): WP:SIRS-compliant
- Yachtfernsehen (2): Just a passing mention
- sapsailing.com (3): Obviously not independent
- sail-world.com (4): Not even a passing mention
- FuW (5): Not even a passing mention (but an acceptable source for the claim that Jim Hagemann Snabe is a sailor)
- Financial Times (6): Behind a paywall
- Marketscreener (7): Not an independent source
- sail-world.com (8): Could be WP:SIRS-compliant, but I suspect a press release
- extremesailingseries.com (9): Press release, not independent
- sapsailing.com (10): Not independent
- Sailing-Champnsleague (11): Press release, not independent, but reliable
- webandsail (12): WP:SIRS-compliant
- SAP Blog (13): Doesn't need any exaplaining, neither independent nor reliable
- Spinsheet (14): No mention of SAP Sailing Analytics
- Sailingworld (15): No mention of SAP Sailing Analytics
- 49er.org (16): Could be WP:SIRS-compliant
- Sailing.org (17): Just a passing mention
- Aarhus2018.sailing.org (18): Just a passing mention
- DenHaag2023 (19): Just a passing mention
- Sail-World.com (20): Could be WP:SIRS-compliant, but there is not author information (i.e., it could be a press release)
- Australiansailingteam (21): Not even a passing mention
- Teschke (22): An acceptable WP:SIRS-compliant source, but it doesn't contain the term "Python". And the pages make sense, but 18-31 is a wide range of pages.
- The Ctrl-F search may not always be useful, I'm afraid. Sources may only reference the fact that SAP was supporting the event with analytics, etc., so the literal name "SAP Sailing Analytics" may not always occur, yet, in most cases the links provided by those sites lead to the sapsailing.com site, directly or indirectly, and probably to one of the various sub-sites create for those specific events, later archived to (www.)sapsailing.com.
- Please re-consider and let me know which changes would be required. I still think that the sailing community is very well aware of the SAP Sailing Analytics and may benefit from it being described here. Axeluhl (talk) 23:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SAP Sailing Analytics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:SAP Sailing Analytics has a new comment
Your draft article, Draft:SAP Sailing Analytics
Hello, Axeluhl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "SAP Sailing Analytics".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: SAP Sailing Analytics (December 9)
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
The comment the reviewer left was:
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
There is still a significant amount of unsourced content, and from my checks I don't see that the concerns about notability and text-source integrity have been adequately addressed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SAP Sailing Analytics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.