User talk:B0b3rp4ws

Hello, B0b3rp4ws. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LGBTQ movements in Poland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, B0b3rp4ws. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:UAS International Trip Support, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello B0b3rp4ws. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Leon Software, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:B0b3rp4ws. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=B0b3rp4ws|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:23, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello 10mmsocket,

sorry for taking a while to respond. I'd like to say I am not being compensated for my edits. I've been adding information to various articles related to business aviation based on news outlets. I linked some of the mentions of Leon Software in hopes of being able to create a separate page for it some day, considering I see it mentioned fairly often these days. I find the business aviation side of Wikipedia to be quite lacking, but I understand the issue with creating articles for it, considering they can end up looking like ads easily. I apologize if in my effort of chipping in my own edits had a similar effect. B0b3rp4ws (talk) 09:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks so much for letting me know. I would go ahead and focus on creating the Leon Software article. Let me know if you need any help. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:16, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi,

I originally submitted a draft for the article sometime in February, but it was declined. I added a few bits of new information about it today. Would you be so kind as to give it a look and tell me how to improve it? In particular, the issue seems to lie with the sources. From what I remember, I did ask about it, but didn't fully understand it and decided to drop it for the time being. I'd find it most helpful if you could use an example while giving me advice on it? For example, "this source is unreliable because..."

No pressure of course. B0b3rp4ws (talk) 12:31, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Forgot to include the link to it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Leon_Software B0b3rp4ws (talk) 12:31, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Most of the references are OK although they're mainly based on press releases. Try to broaden the type of reference. I left some feedback in the draft for you. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:04, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much, I'll report back when I have some time to update it again. Your help means a lot! B0b3rp4ws (talk) 08:54, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi,

it's been a while, I hope you're doing well. I've made some additions to the draft, not sure I can find any more sources at this point. If it's not too much trouble, could you check it for me? B0b3rp4ws (talk) 11:32, 29 June 2026 (UTC)