User talk:Bisettes

Hello, Bisettes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I am pleased to present you with your very first service award, in recognition of becoming a Wikipedia contributor.

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that may help you to get up to speed:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Signpost, our newspaper.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page.

Again, welcome! C F A 💬 17:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Trailblazer101. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Captain America: Brave New World seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

I'm familiar with Wikipedias diversity of opinions. Nothing I added was unsourced or biased; I did not add any marker of thinking whether or not a view was the "correct" one, I simply described the controversy. Respectfully, you are projecting here. Bisettes (talk) 21:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

As I explained in my edit summary, kindly engage with other editors already discussing how to adequately address this subject, rather than unilaterally adding it yourself. There are some WP:UNDUE concerns that have not been addressed yet in what you and others have added that dod not directly have an impact on this film. Please engage at Talk:Captain America: Brave New World to discuss this further. I am not being "biased", I just want everyone to have a civil and constructive discussion to all be on the same page in how best to address this. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:49, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

The two editors are arguing back and forth with each other. You yourself agreed that a controversy section makes sense. If you believe there is an issue with what I wrote, feel free to update it or change it to be less "less than neutral" as you claim I've been for simply including facts. To simply mass delete it comes across as being biased yourself, especially since I made no claim towards whether or not the boycotts were justified or fair. Bisettes (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your WP:BOLD edit was reverted multiple times. It is about controversial information that is already being discussed at the talk page. Please follow WP:BRD and stop editing the article until consensus is found at the talk page. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:52, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Okay. I posted my section on the talk page instead. Please reply to the topic I've added. Bisettes (talk) 21:57, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Trailblazer101 (talk) 10:09, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Fuck U Skrillex You Think Ur Andy Warhol but Ur Not!!, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:21, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:City Cinderella.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 03:13, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FDNY Engine 81 Ladder 33 on Bailey Avenue.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 03:18, 11 December 2025 (UTC)