User talk:Bowmanspartan

The article you created, Nicholas David Bowman appears to be an autobiography. Wikipedia has a policy on this at WP:AUTO. This information would be perfectly find on your user page, but there is no need to create an article of it. I have nominated the article under the criteria for speedy deletion. Welcome to Wikpedia. --MECU≈talk 01:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello, Bowmanspartan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Communication Research Reports, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Bowmanspartan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Communication Research Reports".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CoolSkittle (talk) 15:10, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Bowmanspartan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Global Perspectives in Communication, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MSK was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Global Perspectives in Communication and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 16:42, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! I suspect we still need additional sources for this one. I'll consult other Wikipedia entries for journals and continue working on this. For instance, I suspect once we're indexed by some of the major journal databases, this would help a bit. Journals don't often get press/media mentions but I'll continue searching for those also - for additional context. Bowmanspartan (talk) 11:14, 12 March 2026 (UTC)