User talk:BoyDannyOh

Hello, I'm Somepinkdude. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nicole Junkermann, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Somepinkdude (talk) 00:45, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nicole Junkermann, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:55, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Nicole Junkermann. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 11:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Did you read my sources? You should not blank sections without reading first. It's impossible to have red them in 3 minutes. BoyDannyOh (talk) 11:40, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

FDW777 (talk) 16:10, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi! If you believe that an admin is acting improperly it's best to make a discussion on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents about it. Just make sure to inform them of the thread afterwards! Trade (talk) 23:37, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

@BoyDannyOh:--Trade (talk) 23:38, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:42, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked for one month from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

In addition to your repeated violations of BLP policy, you have been edit warring, editing against consensus, and repeatedly attempting to use unreliable sources. Please spend the next month learning more about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cullen328 (talk) 01:39, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

By the consensus of the Wikipedia community, you have been topic-banned from the topic of Jeffrey Epstein, broadly construed. When your block expires, appealing this topic ban can be done following the procedures at WP:UNBAN. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:44, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I am not an experienced editor.

I just came around an article about Nicole Junkermann and how she is the one german person with most links to Epstein.

Wanted to check her wiki page and now there is a headline notice about the article being in discussion about a deletion.

Here is a reddit page about her: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/JFlueW3MV0

Do you think I should reroll the addition of her links to Epstein or will I probably just get banned aswell from the topic? Noktamor (talk) 07:23, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

https://www.t-online.de/nachrichten/ausland/internationale-politik/id_101114238/epstein-files-nicole-junkermann-war-seine-deutsche-vertraute.html

this is an article from a german news paper Noktamor (talk) 07:26, 8 February 2026 (UTC)