User talk:Branstarx3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
hi Branstarx3, thanks for your update. But alone updating the one graph is not a good idea. This brings data inconsistency on the page in many places. So, it will be helpful if you change data at all the places it requires. Let me know what is your thought by writing on my talk page.
June 2020
Hello. Your recent edit to Kahlon appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 09:26, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Branstarx3, you are invited to the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hi Branstarx3! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Shubhangi Swaroop has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jeromeenriquez (talk) 20:15, 16 June 2020 (UTC)August 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Toppr. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. SamHolt6 (talk) 16:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Controversial topic area alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— Newslinger talk 05:23, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
2020 Bangalore riots
We're just trying to help. Also please see when and how to use templates, such as the one of "semi-protected" and "block". SerChevalerie (talk) 15:30, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
There are some Vandalism in edits with random IP address Branstarx3 (talk) 15:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Branstarx3, I know, but Template:Semi-protected and Template:Uw-block can only be used by administrators. You can give users warnings, such as Template:Uw-vandalism1. Best regards, SerChevalerie (talk) 15:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- SerChevalerie thanks for your help Branstarx3 (talk) 15:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to 2020 Bangalore riots, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 15:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Comment i appealed for protection of page 2020 Bangalore riots as some miscreants are trying to give it communal colour and indulge politics in article , also one of the user made bigotry comment on my talk page who i attempted to blocked, fellow contributors are welcomed even i am here as a contributor but vandalism would not be accepted in name of contribution. Branstarx3 (talk) 15:43, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- Branstarx3, appeals for page protection go to WP:RPP. SerChevalerie (talk) 18:37, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio
Hi, you added two images from the internet, which were not shared into the public domain. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia and Wikimedia's copyright policies, particularly those on images. Further, do NOT remove deletion templates from your work, as only administrators are permitted to do so (generally speaking). Violations of the above will get you blocked in the future. SerChevalerie (talk) 18:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
- I
Agree with decision Branstarx3 (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Branstarx3, see Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. In general, images published by anyone else CANNOT be used, unless they were published before 1960. If you want to add images to Wikimedia Commons, try to click pictures yourself and publishing them to Commons. Alternatively, contact the photographer and request them to do so. SerChevalerie (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Okay thanks, and can we use from free public domain? If yes then where Branstarx3 (talk) 15:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Branstarx3, yes, of course, but you need to check the licensing to make sure that it is in public domain first. Eg. Bollywood Hungama releases all their images of events, parties, etc. in the public domain. So does the Press Information Bureau, which is why we have such high-quality images of politicians. SerChevalerie (talk) 15:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Okay i see , thanks Branstarx3 (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Branstarx3, yes, of course, but you need to check the licensing to make sure that it is in public domain first. Eg. Bollywood Hungama releases all their images of events, parties, etc. in the public domain. So does the Press Information Bureau, which is why we have such high-quality images of politicians. SerChevalerie (talk) 15:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Okay thanks, and can we use from free public domain? If yes then where Branstarx3 (talk) 15:10, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- Branstarx3, see Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. In general, images published by anyone else CANNOT be used, unless they were published before 1960. If you want to add images to Wikimedia Commons, try to click pictures yourself and publishing them to Commons. Alternatively, contact the photographer and request them to do so. SerChevalerie (talk) 14:59, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Important notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
SerChevalerie (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Branstarx3 (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
Your recent edits to Talk:Violence against Muslims in India could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 13:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Article u mentioned is already giving impression which is not good for Wikipedia as it has many issues in facts morphed and written with a motive , mention of Narendra Modi in article is heavily politically/ideologically motivated ignoring the fact that Modi has nothing to do with 2002 Gujarat riots as by Supreme Court of India and the author of article has blindly ignored Official Notice and judgement of Supreme Court of India [1] Wikipedia allows NPOV and that article clearly seems to violate this policy Branstarx3 (talk) 13:15, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- See WP:ANI#Legal threats by Branstarx3 — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 13:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Disagree with any such Legal Threat, WP:ANI#PA Branstarx3 (talk) 13:32, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Billhpike
Sorry! I am reverting my edits to Talk:Violence against Muslims in India which as by u could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that i may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Which is not the fact actually. Still, following wiki policy i am reverting my edits on talk page of article mentioned above.Branstarx3 (talk) 13:58, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
- Billhpike
- See WP:ANI#Legal threats by Branstarx3 — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 13:26, 13 August 2020 (UTC)


