User talk:Carbohydrateprogrammer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Carbohydrateprogrammer's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Untitled section

I have revised this draft to address the concerns raised in the March 13 decline. The promotional language has been removed and the tone rewritten to be strictly neutral and encyclopedic. The previous sources (woorkup listicle, Bitwarden integration page, Cloudflare DNS docs, WhoisFreaks database lookup) have been replaced with four independent secondary sources that each discuss the subject in depth: (1) a full-length review by tech journalist James Cridland, (2) a technical case study published by infrastructure provider DataPacket and (3) an official announcement from Canonical explaining their adoption of the service for Ubuntu Member email aliases. I have also disclosed my connection to the subject per Wikipedia's Terms of Use. Thank you for your time reviewing this draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carbohydrateprogrammer (talk • contribs) 20:44, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forward Email (March 13)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Seawolf35, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for web content. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Forward Email to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

--Seawolf35 ^T--C 19:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Carbohydrateprogrammer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --Seawolf35 ^T--C 19:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Next steps

Edit the draft to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Carbohydrateprogrammer (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

The DataPacket case study is very notable and independent, and they're being used by Cambridge, UMD, Tufts, etc. That is super notable.

Also the statistics on their usage is insane, 1.6M domains (40% more than Proton Mail and 35X as many as Tuta).

It also needs its own page otherwise it can't be included as a webmail provider.

This makes sense why people are switching to Grokipedia... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carbohydrateprogrammer (talk • contribs) 19:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Next steps

Edit the draft to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Carbohydrateprogrammer (talk) 19:57, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

The DataPacket case study is very notable and independent, and they're being used by Cambridge, UMD, Tufts, etc. That is super notable.

Also the statistics on their usage is insane, 1.6M domains (40% more than Proton Mail and 35X as many as Tuta).

It also needs its own page otherwise it can't be included as a webmail provider.

This makes sense why people are switching to Grokipedia... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carbohydrateprogrammer (talk • contribs) 19:57, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forward Email (March 13)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, LuniZunie, left the following feedback:

This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

promotional language: see Words to watch;
personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Forward Email to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

– LuniZunie_(talk) 20:05, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forward Email (March 13)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Guninvalid, left the following feedback:

The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

Sources 1-2 are blog entries and source 3 is trivial coverage. Please restart from scratch by finding sources first and adding content later.

Next steps

If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

guninvalid (talk) 21:03, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

In particular, your editing pattern shows strong signs of using large language models or other tools to edit Wikipedia. This is discouraged, as these tools frequently introduce prose errors and factual errors into text. Please disclose which tools you are using and how. If you are not using such tools, please disclose as such as well. guninvalid (talk) 21:12, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles