User talk:Cathodography

Your good article nomination of the article Acabou Chorare is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AskeeaeWiki -- AskeeaeWiki (talk) 06:06, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Acabou Chorare has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AskeeaeWiki -- AskeeaeWiki (talk) 06:04, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Meu Coco has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:26, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! A belated happy new year to you! First let me say, wow! We now have over 150 members!! We've grown a lot since the Latin music project became its own WikiProject 14 years ago!! Anyways, I wanted to bring your attention to two things: 1) We have collaborated with WikiProject Latino and Hispanic heritage to have our own Discord server! It can be found here! We have our own dedicated music channel on the Latinos Discord server. 2), Women in Latin music is now open as its own taskforce!! Thanks for the consensus from from the WikiProject talk page!! Both of these are entirely optional, but I just wanted bring these to your attention. Anyways, again happy belated year and let's make this year even bigger!! Erick (talk) 00:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Meu Coco has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:23, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article África Brasil is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arandomfolk -- Arandomfolk (talk) 01:03, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article África Brasil has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Arandomfolk -- Arandomfolk (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Cattos! I'm really sorry, I think I will need to drag on my reviews for a bit longer still. I thought I could reasonably complete the review within a week since my schedule was initially very clear, but unexpected things kept popping up even this weekend which have made me get behind schedule. I feel like I'm failing you considering how long the GAN has gone without a review and I'd understand if you are frustrated so I'll do my best not to drag it on for too long.

Best, Arandomfolk (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

No worries at all, I completely understand how schedules can get unpredictable. There's absolutely no rush on my end, and I really appreciate you taking the time to review the article, especially since this is your first GA review. You’re doing a great job so far :D Whenever you're able to continue is perfectly fine. Cattos^💭 13:56, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding! And I'm really happy to hear you think I'm doing a good job! <3

Btw, I gave the album a listen the other day and quite liked it, so thank you for giving me that opportunity to discover some new music. :) Arandomfolk (talk) 18:07, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Choquei is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alex26337 -- Alex26337 (talk) 07:07, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

On 18 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Piscinão de Ramos, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that visitors to the leisure area Piscinão de Ramos were warned not to wear red for their own safety? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Piscinão de Ramos. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Piscinão de Ramos), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 7,552 views (629.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:30, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

HurricaneZeta^C 00:03, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Davi Brito is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davi Brito until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Morgueço | Morgueco (he/him) 🦇 🇧🇷 talk • contributions 05:02, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaos Space Marine (song), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isaac Wood was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Hey, I've decided to reopen your nomination for another reviewer. Due to issues and concerns I must attend to in my life, I can no longer review your nomination. I hope you can understand my decision. — Alex26337 ^(talk) 23:59, 11 March 2026 (UTC)