User talk:Catiline52
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

- Hi Catiline52! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 23:44, Friday, November 23, 2018 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
January 2020 at Women in Red
|
Women in Red January 2024
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Women in Red September 2025
Recognized as the most successful topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Happy First Edit Day!
| Happy First Edit Day! Hi Catiline52! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!) 23:45, 3 October 2025 (UTC) |
CREditzWiki (Talk to me!!) 23:45, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
| Happy First Edit Day! Hi Catiline52! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 04:48, 6 October 2025 (UTC) |
Women in Red - November 2025
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red - December 2025
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.
Announcements:
Tip of the Month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:16, 28 November 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - January 2026
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 23:30, 26 December 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2026
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 22:46, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - March 2026
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 09:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your edits of Australian Frontier Wars
Hello there
I reverted your edits because your wording was not supported by the cited source. Also the flagcons don't improve the article because most of the flags (including the Aboriginal flag) didn't exist as the time.
I do agree with you that the wording of the lead sentence wasn't very good, so I have rewritten it slightly to make it more consistent with the cited source.
Happy to discuss on the article talk page. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 11:44, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
A fox for you!

Thank you for taking the bold edit to remove the smudge on Wikipedia's credibility that is the centre alliance on the wikibox. I hope it doesn't come back.
Pencilceaser123 (talk) 23:02, 4 March 2026 (UTC)











