User talk:Catjacket
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bissau
Hi Catjacket. You added references to "Mendy 2013" to Bissau, but no such work is defined in the article. Could you added the required cite to the Sources section, or let me know what work this refers to? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing this out. Confusion between different editions of the same book. I'm still working on the history section, but I'll fix this ASAP. Catjacket (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks Carjacket. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 12:29, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
| The Original Barnstar | |
| Awesome work on African history articles btw! BuySomeApples (talk) 23:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC) |
Wikiproject
Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Ghana Empire, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 19:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
- Absolutely!! I've never worked on a Wikipedia taskforce before, but very excited to participate. How does it work? Catjacket (talk) 02:39, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- It’s a place for people to collaborate on improving Wikipedia’s coverage of oral tradition. It’s still very nascent so there are lots of things that need to be done and what exactly it’ll involve hasn’t been completely clarified, at the moment we’re discussing the scope. Anybody can suggest initiatives on the talk page and edit the main page (there’s no leaders, it relies on consensus) and give ideas. I recommend seeing WP:WikiProject Kowal2701 (talk) 06:33, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry I should’ve said earlier but we’re working on Draft:Oral traditions of the Soninke people if that’s something you might be interested in? None of us speak French so we can’t access a lot of the literature Kowal2701 (talk) 10:50, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
- For sure, I'll take a look and see what I can contribute. I speak French, are there any paticular sources that y'all need help integrating? Catjacket (talk) 18:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I haven’t been able to have a proper look but there’s a couple mentioned in Conrad and Fisher’s “The conquest that never was”, I’ll give the links in a sec Kowal2701 (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- We’re looking at rewriting the sections on epics so that they’re summaries rather than transcriptions and translations Kowal2701 (talk) 19:18, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- There's fr:Bida (mythologie), and Legende by Monteil (I can't find a link) Kowal2701 (talk) 19:38, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- For sure, I'll take a look and see what I can contribute. I speak French, are there any paticular sources that y'all need help integrating? Catjacket (talk) 18:52, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
The World Destubathon
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It started today on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:00, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Tuabou

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Tuabou requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:
- Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
- Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
- Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:17, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I responded on the talk page. I think that nominating this article for speedy deletion is unnecessary and harsh. Tagging the page with 'More citations needed' or something would have been better. If the link in the population information is dead, you can just mark the link as such. It's copied from the original page on the French wikipedia. I acknowledge that I should have checked if the link worked, but that's got nothing to do with AI chatbots. For the ISBN thing, a simple search in Google books would have brought up the Gomez book and proven that the source is legit. Do your homework before accusing people of using chatbots. Catjacket (talk) 17:31, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
Edit on Sack of Old Oyo:
Hello, is aw you edited, my Wikipedia page, and edited something completely different? That had nothing to do with my page? Maybe you an make as standalone wiki page on a separate sack of old oyo you're discussing? Because this has nothing to do with my sack of old oyo, that not only has more sources, but older, more credible, by yoruba historians in the 19th century. I just want to know why you deleted everything on my wikipedia, and wrote a random write up, with barely any sources. This wikipedia took weeks, of editing, and requiring multiple wiki mods revciewing the evidence of both sides. Again, can you explain why you removed basically my page, and sourced a different sack, or fall to the one i'm discussing? I think actions like this can fall under requirements for a report, if you don't explain.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oluwafemi1726 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Disingenuos edit on my page, "Sack of Old Oyo"
Hello, i Saw you edited, my Wikipedia page, and edited something completely different? That had nothing to do with my page? Maybe you an make as standalone wiki page on a separate sack of old oyo you're discussing? Because this has nothing to do with my sack of old oyo, that not only has more sources, but older, more credible, by yoruba historians in the 19th century. I just want to know why you deleted everything on my wikipedia, and wrote a random write up, with barely any sources. This Wikipedia took weeks, of editing, and requiring multiple wiki mods reviewing the evidence of both sides. Which can be seen her ( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sack of Old Oyo ),
- furthermore, your "sources" the oldest, one is 1959, again, i think anyone that's being neutral can see i have more "ancient", or "grounded" sources, that link directly to people that lived in that error, (1800's) Like arguably the most accredited Yoruba Historian Samuel Johnson. Even in the battle box, he removed the Sokoto caliphate, when Ilorin was under the leadership of it, and completely ignored the fact that after this, led directly to fula settlements in Yorubaland. All of this can easily be found by reading The history of the Yorubas : from the earliest times to the beginning of the British Protectorate, by Samuel Johnson, which is by far the most accredited Yoruba historical book prior to colonialism. Again, can you explain why you removed basically my page, and sourced a different sack, or fall to the one i'm discussing?
- This is evident, as you removed my soruce which goes into detail, the sacking, and how towns left, like "All the towns owing "any allegiance to Oyo, and hence Gbodo was besieged"[1. While your "sources", you didn't cite a single one, or have any real reference, in context to where you put them in your text. its obvious you just looked up random sources, to cite in your wiki page, that you didn't read.
- My sources, citations, i put direct quotes which you didn't. every citation goes directly, to the text/narration of the part of the page its cited in. And i again, included the oldest document in both of our edits, and arguably the most important, and detailed book on yoruba history, prior to colonialism.
I don't appreciate you just removing, my wikipedia , and adding a shorter one, with less "official" sources, with no quotes, for no reason. This is grounds for reporting, so i'd appreciate a response.
Oluwafemi1726 (talk) 21:00, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I responded on the Talk:Sack of Old Oyo page. Let's discuss there, since it's only about that article. Catjacket (talk) 21:34, 25 August 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of Kingdom of Wuli is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Kingdom of Wuli is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 22:26, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of Kingdom of Wuli is on hold
Your good article nomination of the article Kingdom of Wuli has been placed
on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 02:47, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of Kingdom of Wuli has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Kingdom of Wuli has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vigilantcosmicpenguin -- Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk) 23:28, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
GHA
Hi, hope you're well, just in case you didn't catch it, UNESCO's released two more volumes of the General History of Africa, volumes 9 and 10, might find them useful Kowal2701 (talk) 00:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- oh shiiiiiiit Christmas comes early! thanks! Catjacket (talk) 09:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Btw you might be interested in fr:Royaume du Bandial? It's a World Heritage Site (somehow) Kowal2701 (talk) 23:12, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
- Relax it's tentative lol. Doesn't look like there's much information on the 'kingdom' of Bandial. I've heard of these houses, but not of a kingdom around them. Probably more of a village-level chiefdom, since the Jola famously didn't have kings. I will add some info to Bandial, but a separate article doesn't seem necessary. Catjacket (talk) 08:20, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
- Btw you might be interested in fr:Royaume du Bandial? It's a World Heritage Site (somehow) Kowal2701 (talk) 23:12, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Catjacket, if you had to add one or two more sentences to User:Kowal2701/sandbox#Western Sahel and Sudan (covering 7th century–c. 1800), what would they be? It's for History of Africa Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 19:37, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- Senegambia is probably not going to coverage in other sections, so maybe something about Jolof's collapse into Serer and Wolof states? Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 19:51, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
- There are a number of things I would change about this paragraph, not just add some content on Jolof. This is your project so I don't want to step on your toes, but do you mind if I rewrite it? Obviously you can take or toss whatever you like from what I put in. But based on my overall reading I don't think that Takrur was ever a vassal of Ghana, Awdaghost wasn't the capital of Ghana, and a couple other things. Catjacket (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah that's okay, go ahead. I copied the Takrur bit from History of Africa#The western Sahel and Sudan which I thought you wrote IIRC? IIRC Conrad and Fisher just say Aoudaghost was a royal seat rather than the capital, but worth checking. I'm trying to keep these sections between 250 and 350 words which is challenging, basically just trying to include the most important historical developments and give fair coverage across a region. Happy to defer to you as I've not done much work on West Africa tbh Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 21:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah... it is very likely that there is content that I myself put on Wikipedia in the past that I no longer agree with. I'm always trying to read more and more widely, so my opinions evolve. And then sometimes there are things that seem clearly true if you put several sources in conversation with each other, but none of them explicitly make the connection, so you can't use it here... it's complicated. Catjacket (talk) 21:20, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- I had that problem w the sentence on Mali's collapse/Songhai's rise, struggled to find a source that gave a coherent narrative (and mentioned Yatenga's role). Ngl I copy content I've written to other pages a lot, and have sometimes found some very dumb mistakes. Key is just to keep reading I guess, I'm only able to do this 'project' after two years of reading/writing, even then my knowledge/understanding is hopelessly shallow in places Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 21:28, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- Michel Izard, the most prominent historian of the Mossi that I know of, does not believe that the Mossi who raided the Mali empire and helped break their hold on the Niger Bend are the same people who founded Yatenga etc. I'm not sold on his argument, but still you definitely should not go out to look for sources that say that Yatenga had a role.
- Michael Gomez's African Dominion could probably be your coherent narrative source. But also let's not forget that Mali did not collapse when Songhai rose. It remained a powerful, if somewhat diminished and southerly state, and didn't collapse until after Songhai did. Catjacket (talk) 21:42, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- How on earth have I not heard of that book before. Thanks, I'll use it in future. Re Yatenga, Zahan 1973 discusses origins. Re Mali, yeah, it's more their empire collapsed, but it's hard not to be grotesquely reductive with the word limit. Main purpose is giving people a cursory view and the links to learn more Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 22:04, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- I had that problem w the sentence on Mali's collapse/Songhai's rise, struggled to find a source that gave a coherent narrative (and mentioned Yatenga's role). Ngl I copy content I've written to other pages a lot, and have sometimes found some very dumb mistakes. Key is just to keep reading I guess, I'm only able to do this 'project' after two years of reading/writing, even then my knowledge/understanding is hopelessly shallow in places Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 21:28, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah... it is very likely that there is content that I myself put on Wikipedia in the past that I no longer agree with. I'm always trying to read more and more widely, so my opinions evolve. And then sometimes there are things that seem clearly true if you put several sources in conversation with each other, but none of them explicitly make the connection, so you can't use it here... it's complicated. Catjacket (talk) 21:20, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah that's okay, go ahead. I copied the Takrur bit from History of Africa#The western Sahel and Sudan which I thought you wrote IIRC? IIRC Conrad and Fisher just say Aoudaghost was a royal seat rather than the capital, but worth checking. I'm trying to keep these sections between 250 and 350 words which is challenging, basically just trying to include the most important historical developments and give fair coverage across a region. Happy to defer to you as I've not done much work on West Africa tbh Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 21:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- There are a number of things I would change about this paragraph, not just add some content on Jolof. This is your project so I don't want to step on your toes, but do you mind if I rewrite it? Obviously you can take or toss whatever you like from what I put in. But based on my overall reading I don't think that Takrur was ever a vassal of Ghana, Awdaghost wasn't the capital of Ghana, and a couple other things. Catjacket (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- Senegambia is probably not going to coverage in other sections, so maybe something about Jolof's collapse into Serer and Wolof states? Kowal2701 (talk, contribs) 19:51, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Catjacket. Thank you for your work on Jambukhu. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
- I enjoyed reading this article. Please translate the title of the foreign language reference(s) into English. Foreign language references should retain the foreign language version
|title=, and add the translated title|trans-title=. More information here: Wikipedia:Press coverage. If you have a question, please ping me. Thanks.
- I enjoyed reading this article. Please translate the title of the foreign language reference(s) into English. Foreign language references should retain the foreign language version
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Disambiguation link notification for November 13
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Aguibou Tall
- added a link pointing to Koundian
- List of Légion d'honneur recipients by name (T)
- added a link pointing to Macina
- List of foreign recipients of the Légion d'Honneur by country
- added a link pointing to Macina
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:11, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 18 November 2025 (UTC)