User talk:Chalbeis

-- Hope this helps! Regards, Lynch7 15:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Awesome, you found out how to cite sources. A small thing: You don't need to put the "(Edited 2/10/12)" note at the end of the edit. Lynch7 04:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I've moved it back to your standbox since it isn't really ready to be an article yet. The topic is also likely to need narrowing a bit. Food treds is a bit imprecise as a title since it could cover well anything from the movement of the standard food basket out of the Fertile Crescent onwards.©Geni 05:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello - please do some work cleaning up your article. You have a "testing sources" section that does not belong there. You need to do some work on your article before people can give you constructive feedback on where to take your article next. Debaser42 (talk) 15:34, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

The article Food trends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

mess. not clear what the article is about and not a useful starting point for writing a viable article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ©Geni 19:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Food trends is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Food trends until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:17, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

• Catherine. I found the article, in its current form, much too much like a personal essay to stand as an encyclopedia article and I fear it will succumb to the deletion process without a lot of quick work. I did post a few quick links to news articles in my comment on the deletion discussion page for the article. I think the subject can be developed into an appropriate article, based on the sources I was able to find with very little effort. A suggestion: an administrator (which I'm not) can move the entire article to a subpage of your user page (this is called userfying) where it can be worked on without so many eyes seeking to give it the rush out the door. You can even invite collaborators to help and also have the article reviewed by other editors for helpful hints at various stages of development. Once developed, the article can be moved back to mainspace, where the articles reside. On the userfy page, there is a list of admins willing to do this (userfy) for you. Don't give up! Geoff ^{Who, me?} 22:07, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

• I've closed the AFD discussion as delete but have userfied the article to User:Chalbeis/Food trends. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello - your article, Lifestyle_trends_and_media is still very short and includes some obvious problems (such as "testing sources") that should have already been overcome. Additionally, there is nothing in your talk page, suggesting that your editors haven't given you any feedback. You have VERY little time left to write your article and I suggest you not only continue to work hard on this but also request feedback from your editors ASAP. Debaser42 (talk) 13:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:29, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 19:24, 21 May 2012 (UTC)