User talk:Concealocanth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Concealocanth, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Welcome!

Since you've shown some interest in editing topics related to India, we hope you'll stay and add content to India related articles. Consider joining or watchlisting India related discussions (for example, Noticeboard for India-related topics). Again, welcome!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, ask a question on your talk page. Bongan® →TalkToMe← 13:13, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pagurus hemphilli has been accepted

Pagurus hemphilli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 21:47, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Usage of iNaturalist

Hi Concealocanth, and thanks for creating Codium setchellii. I noticed you sourced a common name of the species to iNaturalist. Please note that, while it's a valuable source for images, iNaturalist is not considered a reliable source for common names. See WP:INATURALIST for more details. Chess enjoyer (talk) 20:59, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, that's a good point. iNaturalist does have the official policy that only common names cited in the literature can be used, but it is far from the case that every curator there sticks to that policy. I think this one is well-supported, so I'll try to find an alternate source. Concealocanth (talk) 21:07, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI