User talk:Day Creature

Uh I literally have 3 sources, adding them to AOC's section! She is planning her run or suggested and the polls. https://www.metroweekly.com/2026/03/pete-buttigieg-2028-new-hampshire-poll/

https://www.axios.com/2026/03/01/aoc-liberal-democrats-2028

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/aoc-congress-president-2028/ ~2026-81618-8 (talk) 19:11, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

It looks like someone already replied to you at Talk:2028 United States presidential election. When making an edit request you need to provide the exact text you want to be added to the article. Day Creature (talk) 20:52, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi i am not able to edit this pages but there are arround 80 Articles set in Resources a link that have no relevance just than advertising they should all be deleted thanks for yours comment.

There was a German article done: Name: ESC-Kompakt this article was after 2 hours deleted. The one that did write this article does several years prepare the resources with help of others to promote. If you search inside International Wikipedia you will find around in different languages.

search in references 4. the link ESC kompakt (in German) 151. ESC kompakt (in German)

its self marketing to the deleted article (German Wikipedia) They have a ghostwriter maybe. Wikipedia user Johannes did work for them 7 years and is under observation the German support team answered me (I would not write his username here. Source the guys themself in hers Livestream. Just use subtitles for English translation :-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGLPTJcomSI Timecode 45:34

Research was the following they try in this to manipulate ChatGPT and search engines that their Webblog seems to be relevant. Be shure after a while change the impress and resources get paid content.

Search in Wikipedia international not just in German or English for ESC kompakt (in German) and all the Resources links should be deleted. Regards --WGoedert Wgoedert (talk) 21:41, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm having trouble understanding exactly what you're asking me, but it sounds like you're concerned about external links that are potentially spam. You could try asking at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam. Day Creature (talk) 02:23, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your response regarding my requests on the Lebanon war 2026 article. I don't use the English version of Wikipedia too much but it's nice to see how quick people answer. Met4lpuppy (talk) 15:38, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

No problem, happy to be of assistance. Day Creature (talk) 16:07, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

I replied to your response to the latest edit request on Talk:Mansa Musa. ~2026-23913-44 (talk) 16:03, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

I have asked you before to please stop posting on my talk page. I already receive notifications whenever you reply to one of my posts, so these posts to notify me you have replied are unnecessary and unwanted. Please read WP:USERTALKSTOP, and don't post on my talk page again. Day Creature (talk) 16:54, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

I responded to your latest reply to the latest edit request on Talk:Orangutan. ~2026-25968-59 (talk) 12:17, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

You are continuing to ignore my request to stop making these unnecessary posts on my talk page. Unfortunately, I'll have no choice but to seek administrative intervention if this behavior continues. Day Creature (talk) 17:15, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Day Creature,

I just replied to your response to the latest edit request on Talk:Orangutan. ~2026-27000-17 (talk) 14:41, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Greetings. I am writing to kindly request a review of my current account status. My recent contributions, while expansive in scope, were driven by a sincere dedication to elevating the academic rigor and structural clarity of the content. I now recognize that such a significant volume of edits, though well-intentioned, may have inadvertently triggered concerns regarding editorial stability. I have the utmost respect for the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia and the diligent oversight provided by the administrative team. It is my goal to contribute to this global repository of knowledge with the highest professional standards. Moving forward, I am eager to align my editorial workflow with the community’s preferred incremental approach to ensure seamless integration. I would appreciate the opportunity to resume my contributions and look forward to your thoughtful consideration. Custos Veritatis (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Note: I removed the unblock template, as it made it seem as if Day Creature was blocked and making an appeal. MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

@MetalBreaksAndBends I wish to offer a brief clarification to ensure procedural accuracy. Custos Veritatis is indeed my primary account identity. The unblock template was utilized to formally address an automated restriction currently affecting my editorial access, which appears to have been misinterpreted as a third-party inquiry.

I kindly request the restoration of the original appeal to facilitate a professional administrative review. Maintaining the integrity of this dialogue is essential as I seek to align my future contributions with the community’s highest standards. Your assistance in rectifying this misapprehension is greatly valued. Custos Veritatis (talk) 15:06, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

DC isn't a bot and there are no restrictions on your account. If you need the attention of an administrator, you can try WP:AN or one of the other boards on the notice at the top, but from what i've seen, that doesn't appear warranted. MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 15:16, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

@MetalBreaksAndBends "I appreciate your assessment; however, while there may not be a formal administrative block on the account, I am currently facing a localized system suspension on the 'Suggested Edits' feature until May 5th. It appears to be an automated response from the software's internal filters rather than a manual intervention.

I simply wished to clarify this distinction to ensure the administrative record reflects the technical reality of my current access. Thank you for your continued patience and guidance." Custos Veritatis (talk) 15:27, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm not familiar with suspension from suggested edits, so your best bet would be to ask around at the teahouse. MetalBreaksAndBends (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Custos Veritatis, you may have ended up on my talk page because I reverted some of your changes to short descriptions which were made with the suggested edits feature. I'm likewise not familiar with how suspensions from suggested edits work, but in the meantime you're free to edit without using that feature. Please do read WP:SHORTDESC before making any other changes to short descriptions, and I'd suggest adding short descriptions to articles that lack them rather than changing existing ones. Day Creature (talk) 17:13, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the recent edit on 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, and for the reply on the talk page. I'm sorry but i have also to say there is a little syntax error on your edit in the article page.. just a "{" more than due.. please fix this. ~2026-28622-16 (talk) 07:46, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Oops. Thanks for letting me know, it looks like someone else fixed it. Day Creature (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

I'm wondering if you could take a look at what's been happening in the incipit of a related entry, Putin's recognition of the Donbas republics, the edits since May 10th; It seems that two users (LordCollaboration and Rsk6400) believe it's better to keep in incipit section the opinions of probably "Gaza genocide" deniers, rather than the - very important - part of Putin's speech, the ultimatum to Kiev to cease hostilities.
I hope you agree with me that opinions about Putin's statements shouldn't be in the opening (even more if those who say Putin was lying when he spoke of a genocide underway in Donbass appear to be partly the same people who later denied there was a genocide in Gaza), but should be placed only in the secondary "reactions" section. Thank you. ~2026-28988-67 (talk) 17:46, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

My honest advice to you is to avoid getting into content disputes on controversial subjects as an unregistered user. Your editing on that article is a violation of WP:ARBECR, which limits editing on the Russo-Ukrainian war to extended-confirmed users. Day Creature (talk) 17:52, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

I'd like to do that. But how? Is there a way to be notified of edit requests? — Princess Micky (talk) 10:33, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

I check User:AnomieBOT/EPERTable and the related tables. We could always use more people helping with edit requests, glad to see you're interested. Day Creature (talk) 17:54, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much. That's more help than I expected. — Princess Micky (talk) 16:07, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello Day Creature,

I replied to your response to the latest edit request on Talk:Gorilla. ~2026-30391-25 (talk) 12:26, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello Day Creature, pleasure to meet you. I'm the declared paid editor for Pretium Partners. As a participant in Wiki project Edit requests, might you be willing to review the edit request I posted on the Talk page of Pretium's article? It's been sitting in the queue for some time, so I made the most basic, non controversial edits myself. My sense is that what is left needs additional editorial review. If you give me the OK, I can implement and save you some time. Appreciate your input and involvement. Thank you, B for Pretium (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Howy, I replied back to your talk page reply there. ~2026-30863-41 (talk) 17:45, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Just replied again, @Day Creature. ~2026-31215-86 (talk) 09:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi, just so you know, I already receive notifications whenever you reply to me, so there's no need to post on my talk page each time. Day Creature (talk) 17:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I just submitted a new edit request at England. I'm sorry for the ping, but it's connected to the first one I made. Thank you. ~2026-31909-21 (talk) 00:07, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Due to recent sockpuppet activity in the topic area and the fact that your requested changes have some similarity to those made by socks in the past, I've disengaged from answering edit requests on the England article to avoid any potential WP:PROXYING. Please do not ping me again about this. Day Creature (talk) 18:34, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit on my behalf, I would like you to add Seat abolished for me on the former Hereditary peers excluded this year please. ~2026-30058-63 (talk) 14:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Where does this need to be added? You should be able to do it yourself, unless the article(s) are protected. Day Creature (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

good morning, I would like to add a link to Wikiquote to the WP article for Jordan River, but Jordan River is a protected page.

May you add a link to WQ under the template for Wikimedia Commons? Thanks in advance for any eventual help. ~2026-31452-79 (talk) 08:02, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Done. Day Creature (talk) 17:23, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

	...where's the barnstar?
	You were running so fast between all those edit requests, we couldn't find any barnstars in time! | One Reaction was here. Got a complaint? 21:49, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar! Day Creature (talk) 18:34, 30 May 2026 (UTC)