User talk:Demeseriecroitor

If there are couple more websites worth sharing for sources, I would love to see them. I still find ISP Myanmar to be the highest quality. Demeseriecroitor (talk) 17:44, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm JalenBarks. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ahmed Diriye—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jalen Barks (Woof) 19:32, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

hello, in almost every page on jihadist, islamist or frankly, terrorist organisations, the word "terrorist" is almost never used. neither baghdadi or bin laden have the label. even if they commited many crimes, wikipedia prefers the NPOV to all subjects, includind all militant organisations. if you want to insist, you can change it to "designated terrorist" or "internationally designated terrorist" emir of al shabaab ahmed diriye. Demeseriecroitor (talk) 19:38, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

and just for the record, the first leader, and much more extreme, leader of al shabaab, the person who commanded deadly attacks in kenya, ahmed godane, is described as "First leader of Al-Shabaab (2008–2014)" Demeseriecroitor (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

• 2nd emir Demeseriecroitor (talk) 19:41, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

  First of all, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Even though the text is written in the context of deletion discussions, I believe it also applies here. Second, I do not know of any Wikipedia policy that prevents use of the word "terrorist" anywhere. Can you please link such a policy if it exists? Jalen Barks (Woof) 19:50, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

  Wikipedia:Use of the word terrorism (policy development Neutral point of view

  Again, im not saying editors cant say the word terrorist, im simply trying to keep the short description as it is for ALL notorious jihadists. the person in question, at least to my knowledge, has not declared himself to be a terrorist, which would then be enough reason to offer the label in the short description. Im once again saying it would be better to say "designated terrorist" if you want, a description used for preety much all organisations on wikipedia defined as terrorist by the UN security council among others Demeseriecroitor (talk) 20:04, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

  and again, the second emir used a lot more terrorist attacks( defined in the broadest sense, attacks against civilians, a description still not accepted by everyone ) under the current emir, there was another big attack in mogadishu 2022, but under this leadership the jihadists have slightly moderated in their position, adopting a hearts and minds strategy similar to the taliban in afghanistan and hts in syria, it is only a matter of perspective. but, if this is the point you insist on, then the short description of ahmed godine should also be "terrorist leader" or "designated terrorist leader". the same would apply for dozen other articles with militant jihadist people Demeseriecroitor (talk) 20:09, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

  if it is fine with you, this question about his status can be debated on the talk page, and many others can give their opinions, thank you! Demeseriecroitor (talk) 20:11, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

  on the ahmed diriye talk page Demeseriecroitor (talk) 20:12, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Yue. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, People's Liberation Army (Myanmar), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Adding new content and changing existing content requires new reliable sources. Yue🌙 (talk) 09:00, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

My bad, frankly the resignation was a little sketchy, but I found this message on Telegram. Make of it what you will. https://www.reddit.com/r/Myanmarcombatfootage/comments/1rjfqu3/ni_ni_kyaw_officially_retires_as_communist_party/

As for the description however, I will provide the official pocket book for PLA soldiers, where it is specified that marxism leninism and maoism are the main ideologies. Every "communist" movement claims to adhere to true communism, so I will provide this source as it is. https://www.bannedthought.net/Myanmar/CPB/PLA_Handbook_English_Translation.pdf

My apologies for confusing it with MLM. I tried to group them together, but it seems for whatever reason they are two seperate things. Demeseriecroitor (talk) 09:14, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Wa State Party, a link pointing to the disambiguation page EAO was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

good bot Demeseriecroitor (talk) 18:00, 20 August 2026 (UTC)