User talk:JalenBarks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

23 of March, 2026

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


@JalenBarks, why on EARTH can I not use a page from the official website of a record label as the SOURCE for an edit on a Wikipedia article related to that record label. THAT MAKES NO SENSE! Giorgio Bicchiere (talk) 03:25, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia relies on neutral WP:THIRDPARTY coverage for inclusion of a music artist on a record label list. Simple verification alone is not enough; we need the reliable source. Jalen Barks (Woof) 03:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Actually, that does kind of make sense @JalenBarks!
Thank you for informing me, and sorry for sound aggressive! I get frustrated when things confuse me. Giorgio Bicchiere (talk) 03:54, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
same freind, same SomeRandomPersonUDontKnow (talk) 19:36, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Administrators' newsletter – April 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Checkuser changes

removed Giraffer

Oversight changes

added Kj cheetham
removed Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
  • The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

hi, (yadayada please read idk what to put here)

in response to you reverting my edit on Ranboo i see what you are saying, and it isn't promotional. someone did an incorrect redirect to tommyinnit from ranboo, and i was talking to my assigned mentor about how to properly reconstruct the page. sorry for any inconveniences i may have caused you. is it ok to continue trying to correct the page? SomeRandomPersonUDontKnow (talk) 19:40, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Regardless, even if you do try to continue, the version you had did not satisfy the initial concerns raised at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranboo (2nd nomination). Had I not reverted it, it would have been eligible for WP:G4. Jalen Barks (Woof) 19:42, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
yes, I see what you are saying. though at the same time, why is it redirected to tommyinnit? tommy is not ranboo at all, though they are good friends. SomeRandomPersonUDontKnow (talk) 19:50, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Jumping in here as the one who advised OP on article creation on my talk page; I was not aware of the deletion nomination. I think if OP can find sources that make Ranboo pass the GNG it could surpass a deletion nomination consensus; for example if there are new reliable sources about Ranboo. @JalenBarks for more context see the discussion on my talk page. Also, G4 only applies to sufficiently identical copies; thus if OP succeded in finding new sources, making it pass GNG, G4 would not apply. Can we move the discussion to my talk page as that has more context, and to keep the discussion in one place? VidanaliK (talk to me) (contributions) 19:52, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
That would be preferrable, yes. If I'm able to provide any information to help the process, I'll chime in. Jalen Barks (Woof) 19:54, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Vijay Suthar (film maker)

Hi there! I wanted to let you know that I've declined your G4 speedy deletion nomination of Vijay Suthar (film maker) because it is not sufficiently similar to the version previously deleted at AfD. In this case, the AfD took place in 2017, and the article primarily focuses on accomplishments that have happened since then. When considering whether an article is eligible for G4, it's always good to look at the last AfD date and see if the new article contains newer sourcing or information. That said, if you think Suthar still does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, feel free to nominate for deletion via AfD. Thank you! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:22, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Music published by Bitbird

A tag has been placed on Category:Music published by Bitbird indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 06:26, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed L235
added Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
  • The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
  • Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
  • Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI