User talk:EaglesFan37

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 2 July 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I have just been editing the draft for Moon Child to make it different from the deleted article. I rewrote the sentences in each section from scratch, expanded the infobox and created separate sections for "Development", "Release", "Reception" and "Resurgence". The Twitter (TapeDoodles), Squakenet, Arcade History, GamingOnLinux, Kotaku and Time Extension references have been removed. I added author names and archive-urls to the Gamesline (interview), Games That Weren't and Aftermath (coverage) references. I found these references on my own when writing the draft:

• Seven, Metin (January 1994). "The Software Story". Amiga Magazine. No. 25. Uitgeverij Divo. p. 54. Retrieved June 19, 2026.
• MultiMediaMarkt staff (February 20, 1997). "Valkieser doet goede zaken in Cannes". MultiMediaMarkt. Vol. 2, no. 4. Metro AG. p. 3. Retrieved June 19, 2026. (coverage)
• TV-Krant staff (1997). "Moon Child Recensie". TV-Krant. Audax Group-TROS. Retrieved June 19, 2026. (review/rating)
• Klaver, Marie-José (October 31, 1997). "Het 'virus' van Moon Child". NRC Handelsblad. Retrieved June 19, 2026. (coverage/review)
• CD-ROM staff (September 1997). "Van eigen bodem: Moon Child ...en andere titels van Valkieser". CD-ROM Special. CD-ROM Publishing. Retrieved June 19, 2026. (coverage/review, also mentioned/referenced on Valkieser Publishing's old website)
• Team Hoi (1997). "Het spel". Moon Child (Windows) (PDF) (instruction manual). Valkieser Publishing. pp. 4–5. (instruction manual)
• Glas, Thomas (January 1998). "Made in Holland: Valkieser". Power Unlimited. No. 59. VNU Media. p. 39. Retrieved June 19, 2026. (coverage)
• The Multimedia and CD-ROM Directory - Volumes 1-2. TFPL Multimedia. 1998. p. 829. ISBN 9780333670378. Retrieved June 19, 2026.
• Seven, Metin (December 28, 2002). "The Team Hoi saga • a true story". Metin Seven. Archived from the original on June 25, 2003. Retrieved February 25, 2025. Seven, Metin (December 25, 2007). "Hoi Saga". Metin Seven. Archived from the original on October 27, 2007. Retrieved February 25, 2025.
• Drews, Alexander; Busse, Christian (September 2008). "Interview Metin Seven". Amiga Future. No. 74. APC&TCP. pp. 16–17. (interview)
• Froholt, Joachim (September 8, 2016). "Interview with Metin Seven and Reinier van Vliet of Team Hoi". Spillhistorie. Archived from the original on September 13, 2018. Retrieved February 25, 2025. (interview)
• Belderok, Jan-Johan (November 2018). "Interview Metin Seven en Sjors en Dennis: Grove pixels geiler dan gladde polygonen". Power Unlimited. No. 298. Reshift Digital. pp. 46–47. Retrieved June 19, 2026. (interview, mentions Moon Child's 2018 App Store release)
• Seven, Metin (January 13, 2021). "Team Hoi games". Metin Seven. Archived from the original on January 23, 2021. Retrieved June 19, 2026.

I also added the following references, courtesy of Roberth Martinez (he said, "Those are pretty much all of them talking about Moon Child in one way or another."):

• Jan (July 16, 2021). "Interview: Achter de schermen bij Team Hoi". PressPlayOnTape. Archived from the original on July 16, 2021. Retrieved February 25, 2025. (interview)
• "Niews: Tweede OZ Happening". Amiga Magazine. No. 23. Uitgeverij Divo. September 1993. p. 6. Retrieved June 19, 2026. (mentions "AGA Amiga" and "Team Hoi")
• Seven, Metin (November 1993). "Return To Oz: Levende Legendes Live!". Amiga Magazine. No. 24. Uitgeverij Divo. p. 62. Retrieved June 19, 2026.

In the draft, the Amiga Magazine and Future references have quotes from the magazines; Amiga Magazines 24-25 mention that Moon Child was being made as an unofficial sequel to Hoi, and Amiga Future mentions Team Hoi's issues with unpaid royalties and the reason for the game's switch from Amiga to Windows. Is this draft okay to submit for review now? Bladerunner09 (talk) 00:19, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bladerunner09 The draft you have at the moment is clearly different from the earlier version of the article. I would have to see the original AFD to give you an answer.

Just as an FYI, I'm currently waiting for my permission request for permanent NPP rights (which comes along with AfC rights) to be approved. EaglesFan37 (talk) 23:26, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I just saw that you have been granted your NPP rights. Here is Moon Child's original AFD. Bladerunner09 (talk) 07:46, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

@Bladerunner09 You should be able to resubmit it now. EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:43, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you. Bladerunner09 (talk) 19:24, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Marti Emerald, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • Editor (2015-02-19). "Confident of Beating Cancer, Emerald Seeks 3rd Council Term". Times of San Diego. Retrieved 2026-07-09. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:16, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I recently received a notice by @EaglesFan37 that claimed my article on Johanna Cranitch (Australian musician) was generated (at least in parts) by ChatGPT or similar AI tool. That claim is completely false. As the author, I can claim that no part of this article was generated by anyone other than myself (including AI models). I'm happy to prove this point by defending the work if you would just highlight the section you believe was created by AI. A vague accusation should not be reason enough to deny this article, especially if the author is defending the work. Furthermore, the article shows no bias, with every detail being backed by citations. One could argue there are more citations for this brief article than most on Wikipedia. I've made several tweaks and deleted a quote from Cranberries guitar player Neil Hogan in Rolling Stone on her role during the last Cranberries recording as it may be seen as more editorial. I urge you to reconsider your stance. Any quick google search on Johanna Cranitch will show that she is a highly regarded recording artist who was a member of Ireland's Cranberries for many years, among other notable rock acts. Thank you. Battlemefandom (talk) 16:37, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

@Battlemefandom The reason I flagged it for AI was because there was some capitalization of all words in headers (although I think I based that off of film score being capitalized, and not seeing that the "life" in early life was lowercased). The article also recited a bunch of sources where she had received positive reviews from, which is also typical from AI. Looking at the article again, it might not be AI. EaglesFan37 (talk) 16:46, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

@EaglesFan37Understood. Again, this article was not written by AI. Any article written about living musicians and their work can be difficult to find citations that are from neutral articles not highlighting what they've done in a positive way. I do not think that stating Johanna Cranitch played in the Cranberries from 2012-2017 as having positive bias because it was found in an article from Rolling Stone on the band. In that article, it clearly states her role during that recording from the guitar player, Neil Hogan. If that is not a citation, then what is? As for the early life citations, would you have me correct that by finding it in government documents from Australia? To me, having a clear citation from a notable source is reason enough to include it. Saying she is from Australia and attended the jazz university should not be up for debate if I have multiple articles that cite it. Thanks for reconsidering. Battlemefandom (talk) 17:25, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

@Battlemefandom I think you may have misinterpreted what I meant. The part I flagged was The music received positive reviews from The New York Times, The Guardian, and others. EaglesFan37 (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

No problem @EaglesFan37. The music did receive positive reviews from those publications via the citation, but will remove if that helps move this forward. ~2026-38859-18 (talk) 23:56, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Slawinski

Whoever disproves the Jeanne Calment case gets the money—hahaha. By the way, Petrona Hernández López was born in 1891, not 1890—I proved that—whereas Seminnikova was born in 1890; incidentally, 9.4% of the people in that Romanian village agree with me that Jeanne Calment was actually 99 years old. Edward Slavinski (talk) 13:45, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi EaglesFan37, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:00, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

@Rosguill Thank you!!! EaglesFan37 (talk) 17:07, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

I wrote a page about Fadie Musallet who is a public figure. Is there any which prevent the creation of a page? Myriamsd3 (talk) 15:41, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

@Myriamsd3 After your most recent edit, it looks okay! EaglesFan37 (talk) 15:51, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Appreciate your feedback. Any reason why it is still declined? Myriamsd3 (talk) 16:39, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

@Myriamsd3 You have to resubmit the article for it to be submitted for review again. EaglesFan37 (talk) 16:40, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello , feel free to delete any unwarranted citations. However, aside from his inclusion in The Pharcyde, the 2 singles, and multiple tours he’s done with Gorillaz are likely the most notable thing he's done. Which is why they are cited a lot. In my opinion, it doesn't exactly make a difference but maybe I am wrong. Other Pharcyde members Fatlip and Slimkid3 articles survive with only 13 and 15 citations respectively. And being honest it’s pretty vague to say that it is notable enough, but not with these citations. So what exactly is cited incorrectly? 14 of the citations are about Gorillaz, and thats because they are in the paragraph about his work with Gorillaz… The other 20 citations are in other places of the article. What am I missing? Happy to make any changes. Splashmoney15 (talk) 23:53, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

@Splashmoney15 It's moreso that I'd like for a source or two to be added (there has been Variety/Rolling Stone coverage of the band, and 24-HipHop has some solo coverage of him. Then I'd be confident it would survive an AFD. EaglesFan37 (talk) 23:57, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

I hear ya, feel free to add any details or citations I may have missed. I can definitely try to look into it more as well. I agree the Pharcyde section could use a bit more, just wasn’t sure what else to add. Splashmoney15 (talk) 00:07, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

@Splashmoney15 Per the article, he seems to have 10-15 years worth of singles and a career as a solo artist outside the band, but that portion of his career isn't really mentioned as far as I can tell. There should be sourcing of that from RS, which almost certainly exists (I'm not the most versed in music publications so can't definitely say which ones). After that, I'm more than happy to accept the draft! EaglesFan37 (talk) 00:10, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Ok gotcha I will def look into it later today. It’s a bit tricky because his solo career is essentially just a bunch of singles/collabs (most notably the 2 Gorillaz singles, and Moka Only collabs), and 1 mixtape. Splashmoney15 (talk) 12:53, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

I forgot that Rolling Stone requires a subscription, which I do not have. Likely why I didn’t add any citations from them before. However, it allows 1 free article per day/week? Anyways I read this 2022 article, if you are able to read it please do. It has info likely worth including, some of which is on the Pharcyde wiki page. But basically, Bootie Brown owns the Pharcyde name, past Pharcyde members tried to use it (by promoting a Pharcyde reunion and new Pharcyde song), Bootie did not like that. This is also somewhat talked about in the groups wiki article, at least the fact that he owns the name. It seems like they all dislike each other now, except maybe Bootie and Imani? (I know those two have worked together years after the Pharcyde break up, but Bootie seems to dislike ALL of them in the 2022 article). The only other Rolling Stone article I saw was this 2008 article, about a reunion, of course. I think that may have been also why I didn’t add as it is pretty difficult to fully understand. Honestly, when subjects are mired with so much controversy like this, not exactly my specialty lol Splashmoney15 (talk) 19:49, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

@Splashmoney15 I don't have a subscription to Rolling Stone. If there was info on Bootie since 2013 in it, please add it and then I can accept the article. If not, there's a good chance it's passable already and I'll pass it through (albeit it won't be as watertight). EaglesFan37 (talk) 20:00, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

I gotcha I will have to wait until it lets me view that 2022 article again. Splashmoney15 (talk) 20:19, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

I added a lil info to the draft on the disputes and such, I can look into it again in a few days. Splashmoney15 (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

@Splashmoney15 That works for me. Please ping me once that's been sorted out. EaglesFan37 (talk) 20:39, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

I believe you should reconsider the rejection of my article. This article is not a hoax as there is proof Sillyism is a religion and is honored by the EU. Also lighten up. ~2026-39680-61 (talk) 03:58, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-39680-61 I've watched Max Fosh on Youtube before and know what his videos are. His videos are funny, but gags from his videos (especially those without WP:RS) are textbook WP:What Wikipedia Is Not. EaglesFan37 (talk) 04:02, 15 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for flagging concerns with my submitted draft Draft:Sawyer Sharbino and for all the care you put into reviewing submissions. I know it takes a lot of time. I've spent hours on just this one & have now gone through and rewritten the tone/wording throughout, removed the acting credits section (it relied on IMDB and Sawyer's own social media, which I realize isn't reliable enough), and double-checked the remaining citations. I've resubmitted it for review. I'm happy to make any further changes if you spot anything else. If you have any further advice for me, I appreciate your help as I am new here. Thank you again! ContributorfromCA0828 (talk) 02:30, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

@ContributorfromCA0828 Sorry for the late reply. The article looks to be in better shape now. You're more than welcome to resubmit it, and I'll let another AfC reviewer take a look at it! EaglesFan37 (talk) 15:56, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for reviewing the draft article.

I have revised the article to address concerns about impartiality and removed promotional language. I would appreciate it if you would take a quick look and let me know if there are still areas that need improvement, especially regarding tone or source.

Thank you for your time and guidance. Sajjadmrt (talk) 19:55, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

@Sajjadmrt Another user has since flagged the article for having LLM usage, which is not permitted on Wikipedia (please see WP:NOLLM). EaglesFan37 (talk) 15:45, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I spoke to him last night. I have now completely rewritten the article. I explained that I am new to the topic. Fortunately, they accepted my apology. I resubmitted the quote and wrote the tone according to Wiki protocol and provided sources. Thank you. Sajjadmrt (talk) 15:59, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your review. I have completely removed all promotional language from Draft:Sharon Gabay and rewritten the draft to be strictly factual and neutral. I also added a COI declaration on the draft's talk page and resubmitted it. Could you please take another look? Thank you! SHARONGABAY2 (talk) 06:25, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

@SHARONGABAY2 The article looks better than before, but there are still a few concerns. There is still some WP:NPOV concerns, with some MOS:PUFFERY wording ("devoted"), and a bit promotional (listing places photos have been exhibited, and some of the coverage of the book Jerusalemites is a bit promotional). It's not entirely clear that the article meets WP:BIO. Also, topics related to WP:PIA can only be written by ECR-confirmed users, and some of your article touches upon WP:PIA area topics (such as October 7th). EaglesFan37 (talk) 15:53, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi EaglesFan37,

Thank you for the candid feedback. I completely understand the concern regarding the tone. I have fully rewritten the draft from scratch to remove any promotional language or complex formatting that resembles LLM generation.

The text is now strictly restricted to a neutral summary verified by the official Turkish Space Agency announcements and the peer-reviewed AAS/AIAA conference publication. I would appreciate it if you could take another look. Thank you! Spacemantr (talk) 09:47, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi, you declined my recently drafted article on the above topic, stating that it's generated by an LLM. However, no LLM has been used to write it. In fact, I have cited all relevant sources that I have used to write it, and this are important sources too (newspaper coverages).

Could you let me what needs to be edited? Which are the lines that you are flagging as LLM generated?

Any suggestions to prevent this would also be helpful, since I did not use any AI or LLM to write this

Thank you. Looking forward to a response! NKsummer2022 (talk) 15:28, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

@EaglesFan37 Would appreciate a response NKsummer2022 (talk) 09:46, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

@NKsummer2022 Please see WP:WHERESTHEAI. EaglesFan37 (talk) 13:01, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! I wanted to reach out because I noticed your recent draftification of Draft:2026 Banana Ball Championship League season. This was a good draftification, so no worries! I wanted to encourage you to use the MoveToDraft script. This script automatically takes care of several things when moving an article to draftspace, including notifying the article creator and potentially significant contributors, tagging the article as a draft, and more. As a bonus, it will also warn you of inappropriate draftification, such as the article being older than 90 days, being previously draftified, or having been edited in the past hour. Overall, it is super helpful for NPP. Let me know if you have any questions. Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:17, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade I installed it. Thank you!! EaglesFan37 (talk) 17:00, 18 July 2026 (UTC)

Would certainly be interested if you are still in hte process of creating an Eagles wikiproject Jcoolbro (talk) (c) 04:31, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

@Jcoolbro Sorry for not getting back sooner. Unfortunately, I received feedback from other Wikipedians that a Wikiproject was not the best route to go. I have expanded some Eagles articles (Mel Tom, Gary Pettigrew, Norm Willey, and Ron Goodwin), and do plan on expanding more when the time presents itself. EaglesFan37 (talk) 01:38, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

Administrator Elections | RFC phase

The RFC phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started. There are 20 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/RFC phase.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

• Satori (talk · contribs)
  • Eleanor Plunkett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
  • Draft:Eleanor Plunkett (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there. I'm just trying to understand what's missing from the draft. I have multiple sources stating that it's a well-known and oft-performed tune in the Irish tradition. I've established that its been performed by several notable music groups. What else is needed to bring it up to standards for a new article?

-Satori ^(talk) 18:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

@Satori To my knowledge, there is only one source that meets WP:RS. Additionally, the notable recordings section is unsourced. EaglesFan37 (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

I’m trying to edit about 4 film articles on my phone because my laptop isn’t working. But I cannot use draftspace on my phone. Please do not move the rest of my new articles to draftspace. Give me some time and a fair chance to work on them! Thanks. --Cinemaniac86^Talk_Stalk 04:52, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

@Cinemaniac86 I won’t move anymore (was just moving unsourced articles that hadn’t been edited in the past hour to draft space). I’m truly sorry for any inconvenience. EaglesFan37 (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding! It's quite difficult, not gonna lie, to work this way, but easier than on the browser on my phone at least. Hopefully I can go to the library and refine the one you drafted, unless you can move it back for me? But again, thanks for letting me work on these. I will try to get sources for each of them ASAP. --Cinemaniac86^Talk_Stalk 07:52, 21 July 2026 (UTC)

@Cinemaniac86 Sorry for the late reply. For the articles I had draftified, it’s probably best to leave them in the draft space for now until they are more developed. Articles can remain in draft space for as long as it has an edit in the past six months, so you’ll have plenty of time for your current tech issues to be resolved (hopefully). If not, I can make a token edit to preserve the draft at that time. EaglesFan37 (talk) 05:06, 25 July 2026 (UTC)

On 22 July 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mel Tom, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that NFL player Mel Tom reportedly told a coach to "trade me, fire me, or fight me"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mel Tom. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Mel Tom), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

CMD (talk) 12:03, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Hope you're well and thank you for taking the time to review my draft. My draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft%3ASiddiky_family was declined for being LLM generated but I'm not entirely sure why as there was no AI use, and all claims are backed up with citations and links that corroborate the claims. I'm very open to rewriting a specific section if it the writing quality is poor. Thanks in advance for your kind help and I would love to work with you on this to help get the draft through! Jimmycharter123 (talk) 17:15, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

@Jimmycharter123 There was a nonexistent page in the "see also" section, which can be indicative of AI. I could be wrong though. EaglesFan37 (talk) 17:36, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

I see. My apologies on this erroneous error. I just resubmitted with the fix and adjustments to my writing style. I was wondering if you could kindly take another look? Thanks for your help :) Jimmycharter123 (talk) 18:07, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

@Jimmycharter123 I'm going to let another review take a look at it. EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:11, 22 July 2026 (UTC)

Hi EaglesFan37, Could you help me better understand why the profile of Baltimore Museum of Art Director Asma Naeem was rejected? I wrote the original and revised it with AI which got the first rejection, then undid all of those edits to revert back to the original. Everything I wrote is factual and substantiated by a third party source. I want to get this right, but am not seeing what I did wrong. Can you give me some specific examples? I'd really appreciate your guidance. Artbma-anne (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

The This draft is a biographical article about Asma Naeem, an American museum director, curator, and art historian who has served as the Director of the Baltimore Museum of Art since 2023. The subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines through significant coverage in multiple independent sources, including The New York Times, Johns Hopkins University, Smithsonian publications, and major academic presses. I am submitting this article with a conflict of interest and have avoided promotional language. The content is based entirely on third-party sources. I welcome any edits or suggestions that would improve neutrality, sourcing balance, or concision. at the beginning was what caused me to flag it as AI. EaglesFan37 (talk) 16:49, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for getting back to me. Did you look at the entry about Asma Naeem? It was not written by AI. I have reviewed it again and fixed the broken links. I work for the Baltimore Museum of Art and I have never created a Wiki entry before but trying my hardest to make it neutral and follow all the guidelines. Other than the intro is there anything else that needs to be fixed? Artbma-anne (talk) 22:41, 24 July 2026 (UTC)

@Artbma-anne You should declare a COI on this article on either your user-age or on the article with Template:COIN-notice. If you remove the intro and do that, you are welcome to submit it again, although I'm not sure if it meets WP:GNG. EaglesFan37 (talk) 22:46, 24 July 2026 (UTC)