User talk:ExplorerofSpace

Hello! I recently made an edit on the TKCS page regarding their former band teacher, one who I have had personal experience with.

His Linkedin is here and I very strongly believe it is important to ensure this information is out there.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/brad-leonard-a1453b4b 96.248.98.180 (talk) 02:50, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

I do think that that would be a good think to add, but I do think you need too find sources to prove that. If sources are not added, it could be challenged, and then removed. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 02:51, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Oh I have evidence of his entire 10 page confession, how can I send it? 96.248.98.180 (talk) 02:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Do you have a link to a reliable source? ExplorerofSpace (talk) 02:53, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

No link, but I have the photos 96.248.98.180 (talk) 02:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Where did you get the photos from? Were they published by another source? ExplorerofSpace (talk) 02:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

got them from a friend whose mom works at the school, they're complete insider info 96.248.98.180 (talk) 02:58, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

For now add the text (It is also important to note that in 2021 the now former band teacher was fired due to sexual misconduct with a student. This was not made aware to either parents or students and it is unclear if the school had even reported him to any sort of law enforcement in the first place, as his Linkedin still has him listed as a band teacher in a different Christian school.), but add an invisible comment stating how you got the photos. Please note that even doing this may still get it challenged. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 02:59, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

I understand, and thank you so much, nearing my graduation from this hellhole of a school has only made me realize that even if a small amount of people might see this, they'll see it nontheless 96.248.98.180 (talk) 03:00, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Yep, anytime. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 03:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

I would like to remind you that this may still be in violation of Wikipedia policy even though you have evidence. Per Wikipedia policy, the evidence must be published by a reliable source, and first hand research (photos) are not allowed. THIS MAY BE REVERTED AGAIN is what I am saying. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 03:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done ExplorerofSpace (talk) 14:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 12:32, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExplorerofSpace (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I would like account my account to be unblocked for the following reasons: I have not created another account sense my block, and this account was not vandalizing Wikipedia. All I did to have this one blocked was create another account to see if my previous block was over, I was not aware you could create an account when you are blocked. Please consider my request. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 12:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

My use of the CheckUser tool indicate you have used the ExplorerofUniverse and MersmanD accounts. I suggest you take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no more abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 14:10, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ExplorerofSpace (talk) 12:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

@PhilKnight, I do not know if this makes a difference, but that Explorer of Universe account was created at the same time as this one (or at least before this accounts block), and was not evading a ban or trying to get access back to Wikipedia after this account was blocked. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 14:34, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

I still think you should take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time. PhilKnight (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Ok ExplorerofSpace (talk) 20:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ExplorerofSpace (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I have waited a total of 6 months from my first unblock request without any abuse. Can I be unblocked, or is there something else I have to do? If I were unblocked, I would mainly undo vandalism.

Decline reason:

As CoffeeCrumbs stated below, it has not been six months. This account was blocked on 16 June, which means that at the absolute earliest, you would have been eligible to request an unblock on 16 December. The standard offer requires you to refrain from editing the English Wikipedia at all for at least six months: no other accounts, no logged out editing, no talk page messages. In the mean time, you are free to edit other Wikimedia projects, such as the Simple Wikipedia, Commons, or other language Wikipedias. At this point, you may request an unblock on April 18, 2026. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ExplorerofSpace (talk) 10:55, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Also, I do not know how this works, but I had a previous account that got blocked bc it had the same IP of this account, is there any way you could unblock that account, this account, and this accounts alt? Here are the account names @ExplorerofSpace, @User:ExplorerofUniverse, @MersmanD ExplorerofSpace (talk) 11:06, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Six months from August 16th would be February 16th, 2026, and now, six months from October 18th is April 18th, 2026. It'll be up to the reviewing admin how to specifically define the exact contours of whether WP:OFFER has been followed, but since it's not even six months since the first unblock request, my best guess is that it will be probably a no. And I really can't imagine that an admin will start counting from April (when the oldest account was blocked) when you had two accounts blocked in June for block evasion.

Also, it would be highly unusual for sockpuppet accounts to be unblocked. You would almost certainly need a very compelling and specific reason for someone to accept this. I would also urge you to directly address some of your conduct that you don't mention at all; you've previously denied that these were your accounts.

Best of luck to you on your unblock request. If your unblock request is denied, I urge you to not give up and closely follow WP:OFFER for six months of no editing. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 14:33, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

When I created these accounts, I was trying to see if I was unblocked bc I lost access to my old account and no longer have access to the email it was set up on for changing the passwords, that is why I said I did not know. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 16:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Also, those previous accounts were not sock puppets, MersmanD was my previous account, which I can not access and the ExplorerofUniverse was this accounts alt which I stated on the user page. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 16:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

All my edits on these new accounts are all faithful and I pledge that I will not commit and sock puppetry or improper use of account. Please give me a chance and look at this accounts history, it is not vandalism and none of the accounts that I have requested to get unblocked have commited vandalism. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 16:52, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

@PhilKnight Is there any way (other than waiting 6 months) that I could get unblocked. I have a few reasons. First of all, this account did not do and vandalism, the reason it was banned is because of something I did a long time ago while trying to gain edit count. I have changed, this account would not be extended confirmed if it were a vandalism only account. I have been respectful, I have not been a jerk to anyone. I really want to edit Wikipedia. I am sorry for what I have done and will not do it again. I have attempted to edit on the Simple English Wikipedia, but as my favorite thing to do being reverting vandalism, there is not enough vandalism on there to make a difference or to protect the site. They already have enough moderators for a wiki that size. On the English wiki, I actually thought I could still make a difference because there is still so much vandalism that there is a need for more moderators. I promise if I were unblocked, I would not misuse accounts and would review policy. I get if you do not accept this, but I would. like you to really consider this. I really want to edit Wikipedia. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 02:26, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Also, it says this was a sock puppet of MersmanD, but I am not aware that MermanD has edited in the last year, nor has the user vandalized. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 02:37, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

@Yamla - Is there any way I could get unbanned, read the above. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 02:51, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

I just really want to be unbanned. It has been months and I am ready again to faithfully and respectfully contribute. Please. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 03:33, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

You should really follow the WP:OFFER if you're serious about being unblocked. Six months is now May 22, 2026. Multiple admins have suggested that to you, and there are almost certainly no shortcuts at this point. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 07:22, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Ok, if that is the only way, I will now follow WP:OFFER. Thank you. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 12:42, 22 November 2025 (UTC)