User talk:Stefmej

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Zzz plant, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

• hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
• unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
• copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Hello, this draft's sources don't demonstrate if the subject meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline. This source, for instance, is reliable but it just mentions him, it does not offer significant coverage. It would be helpful if you can point to the three best sources that discuss him in depth. I'm seeing some signs of LLM-generated text here as well. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link).

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Stefan Mejerwall to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Zzz plant (talk) 14:06, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Fanimej! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zzz plant (talk) 14:06, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Sorry for my user name. It comes from my name as fan is the end of Stefan and mej is the beginning of my last name Mejerwall. The word fanimej in Swedish trnslates to "goddammit" in english, sorry for that.

Where can I change? I can use my full name Stefan Mejerwall or maybe StefanMej? Fanimej (talk) 13:55, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi, your username looks fine to me - you're not obligated to use your full name (you can review the username guide for new users here). There is also a policy against inappropriate usernames, but personally I don't think fanimej poses a problem in that regard. I just evaluated Draft:Stefan Mejerwall, so you can review the comments up above to see why I didn't accept it. The only additional thing I will mention is that if you have any connection to the subject, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Best, Zzz plant (talk) 14:06, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Does it have to be someone else than me posting about me?

Please check the draft Tricept.

Will that work as a referense?

I made all mechanical drawings, started the production and did the assembly. Everything except machining the parts. Svante Lidholm was the programmer that made it move. Kalle (Karl-Erik Neumann) is the inventor. Later Kalle started Exechon toghether with my fellow mechanical engineer Tomas Andersson. Fanimej (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Please review Wikiepdia's policy on writing articles with LLMs. Your second draft right now is just text on your user talk page; if you want an AFC reviewer to see it, the draft should likely be located at Draft:Tricept. Zzz plant (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry Zzz.

My english is not so good so a got help translating from chat gpt.

Do I need to change some words or spelling?

This is my first time on wikipedia, it is not intuitive enough for an old man...

Can you help me to move the tricept text to where it shall be? Please? Fanimej (talk) 15:12, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

If your English skill is such that you cannot write without using an AI, you should edit the Wikipedia of your primary language instead. There is nothing special about the English Wikipedia, it is not better than others, and the Wikipedia of your primary language likely needs the help more than we do- purely as a matter of the best place for you to use your time.

Your draft should be created via the Article Wizard- but you will need to write it yourself. 331dot (talk) 15:14, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs · Public logs. Last edited by Stefmej (talk | contribs) 10 days ago. (Update)

Tricept is a type of hybrid industrial robot and machine tool based on parallel kinematic principles. Developed in Sweden during the 1990s, Tricept systems combine characteristics of industrial robots and numerically controlled (NC) machine tools, offering high stiffness and flexibility for manufacturing applications.

Tricept machines are based on a parallel kinematic structure with three articulated arms supporting a movable platform. This configuration differs from conventional serial industrial robots and provides higher force, more rigidity and accuracy in certain machining and assembly tasks. However, the work envelope is much smaller than a serial industrial robot.

The concept enables the system to function both as a robotic manipulator and as a machining platform, allowing it to be used for operations such as drilling, milling, pressing, friction stir welding and assembly.

The Tricept concept was developed by the company Neos Robotics located in Täby just north of Stockholm during the late 1980s and early 1990s in Sweden. Neos Robotics was founded by Karl-Erik Neumann, who explored the use of parallel kinematics for industrial applications.

The development was carried out mainly by Stefan Mejerwall and Svante Lidholm contributing to the mechanical design and software development. Initial prototypes were developed during the late 1980s, with the first commercial machines introduced in the early 1990s. The control system used was made by Italian company Comau.

Tricept 600 was developed to be configured as a six axis robot or as a five axis machine tool. When used as a machine tool, the spindle is mounted of center from the wrist center axis because lack of space and improved reach.

Following the Tricept 600 model in the mid 1990 the Tricept 805 was developed. Tricept 805 is Tricept 600 big brother focusing to serve as a machine tool but it was also capable of robotic handling.^[1]

Tricept systems attracted attention in the manufacturing industry due to its capabilities. They were used in applications requiring flexibility and precision, both in machining and assembly tasks.

In order to make it easier for customer to integrate the rather strange mechanical structure of Tricept 805, Neos Robotics developed what they called a Modular Element System, MES, where the Tricept 805 can be installed vertical, horizontal or in a 45 degree angle. With the MES system Neos Robotics configured a complete machining center with tool changer, chip conveyor and an enclosure. The control system used for Tricept 805 was, by the time brand new, Siemens 840D.

At the very beginning in Sweden, Tricept 600 where used by Volvo and Scania. The technology was also applied in projects involving international customers, including Boeing and general motors, where similar systems were used in aircraft manufacturing processes.^[2]

Tricept systems are characterized by:

• Parallel kinematic structure
• High stiffness compared to conventional industrial robots
• Greater flexibility than traditional machine tools
• Capability to perform both machining and robotic operations

The machines typically integrate servo-controlled actuators and advanced control systems to manage the coordinated motion of the parallel arms.

Tricept was one of the first parallel kinematic machines (PKM) on the market and it is used for applications requiring high precision and structural rigidity in combination with high speed.

The concept has been copied in later developments of hybrid machine tools and advanced robotic systems.

• Parallel kinematics
• Industrial robot
• Machine tool