User talk:FeydHuxtable
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200
And here are several pages on what to avoid:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), which are produced by clicking on the
This welcome message was sent by Avi15 at 13:34, August 3, 2008 (UTC) |
Big welcome to the article rescue squadron
Hi, FeydHuxtable, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! Ikip (talk) 19:26, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | |||||
User:Ikip/89 -- full list of rescuable AfD discussions
FeydHuxtable, if you need any help at all, please let me know. Happy to see you as a new member! Ikip (talk) 19:26, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome! Im impressed with how you guys operate. ARS seems to be the place to be and to be seen at :-) FeydHuxtable (talk) 10:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
De Caro Paper and Shroud
Hi, I just stumbled across your discussion on the Shroud of Turin page in relation to the De Caro paper. The discussion seemed to go off the rails pretty quickly and no one seemed to really address the De Caro work. Rather than wade through the lengthy archives, I was wondering if you knew what the objection to that reference ended up being or the consensus on it was? Squatch347 (talk) 13:03, 6 August 2025 (UTC)
- Hey. Unfortuneatly, the concensus both before and after said discussion was not to include the De Caro work.
- To elaborate, from a mainstream science perspective, for many years the 1988 nature study offered the single most convincing bit of positive evidence suggesting the shroud is a fake. At least one of the skeptics partly accepted the fact more recent work has demonstrated the 1988 study is unreliable, but this didn't shift the concensus against De Caro. They didn't quite put it this way, but I think it's fair to say the good editors watching over the Shroud page believe that Carl Sagan's "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" position applies. While Heritage is well regarded in some circles, a paper in their probably doesnt count as extraordinary from a skeptic perspective. If De Caro's work gets favourably referenced in say a systematic review published in Nature , that cleary finds the balance of scientific evidence points to a supernatural origin, then they'd likely acccept adding it to the page. Just my opinion, but unless something like that happens, it may not be a good use of time to try get the De Caro reference added back. FeydHuxtable (talk) 21:04, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
Wishing you a happy 2026!
.jpg)
MMXXVI Lunar Calendar
Have a great 2026 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.
– Background color is Very Peri (#6868ab), Pantone's 2026 Color of the year
– CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:57, 2 January 2026 (UTC)