User talk:Fixthisbs

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zzz plant were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject does not meet criteria of WP:NACTOR, and to otherwise qualify for notability she would need to haveWP:SIGCOV in multiple, reliable, independent, secondary published sources. Being interviewed for a podcast or being discussed on a panel would not qualify as a WP:RS. I appreciate you have made an effort in improving this draft, but I do want to respectfully caution you that based on what I see here and what I've been able to find online- I don't think this subject meets our notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Meghan McLeod and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zzz plant (talk) 23:27, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Also, in the future please also don't delete the comments/decisions left by previous reviewers within the Afc template header. I know it looks cluttered but it's really helpful for us to be able to quickly see the history of the submission and what other reviewers have said in the past. If the draft were to get accepted all that would be deleted, so there is no concern about it being included in a theoretical article. Thank you! Zzz plant (talk) 23:37, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Fixthisbs. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meghan McLeod, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Fixthisbs. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Meghan McLeod".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)