User talk:Flexagoon

hi u a bot? --Idontconsent (talk) 16:09, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Idontconsent, no, I'm a human 🍅 fx (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Feliciak.ox (talk) 02:56, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

តេីខ្ញុំគូរប្រេីពាក្យបែបណា --BB.Leak Bex (talk) 20:42, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @BB.Leak Bex, this is English Wikipedia, so you must use English here. You may be looking for Cambodian Wikipedia.

សួស្តី @BB.Leak Bex នេះគឺជាវិគីភីឌាភាសាអង់គ្លេស ដូច្នេះអ្នកត្រូវតែប្រើភាសាអង់គ្លេសនៅទីនេះ។ អ្នកប្រហែលជាកំពុងស្វែងរក វិគីភីឌាភាសាខ្មែរ។ 🍅 fx (talk) 20:45, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

ខ្ញុំបាទជាម្ចាស់គណនីយ្យ BB.Leak bex ដែលត្រូវក្រុមហ៊ុនfaecbookបានបិតដោយសាមានកំហុសខុសឆ្គង់មួយចំនួនខ្ញុំសង្ឃឹមថាបន្ទាប់ពីខ្ញុំបានស្នេីសុំគណនីយ្យ BB.Leak Bex ក្រុមហ៊ុននិងអនុគ្រោះនិងប្រគល់គណនីយ្យមកអោយខ្ញុំវិញផងចុះខ្ញុំសន្យាថ្ងៃក្រោយនិងមិនអោយខុសឆ្គង់ទៀតឡេីយសូមអរគុណ។ ~2026-29335-59 (talk) 21:03, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

តេីខ្ញុំធ្វេីប្ដេចទេីបរាល់ការផ្លាស់ប្ដូរគណនីយ្យមិនអោយមានកំហុស តេីខ្ញុំបានចូលក្នុងទិន្នន័យអ្វីបានជាប់(UTC)ហេីយតេី(UTC)មានប្រយោជន៍អ្វីខ្លះដែរខ្ញុំសង្ឃឹមគណនីយ្យរបស់ខ្ញុំ ក្រុមហ៊ុននិងប្រគល់ត្រឡប់មកវិញតាមច្បាប់កំណត់ ~2026-29335-59 (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

ខ្ញុំបាទយល់ព្រមតាមលក្ខណ្ឌប្រេីប្រាស់តាមការណែនាំរបស់ក្រុមបន្ទាប់ពីធ្វេីតាមការណែនាំផែនការក្រុមហ៊ុនហេីយ ខ្ញុំក៏សប្បាយចិត្តនិងពេញចិត្តជាខ្លាំងចំពោះការណែនាំរបស់ក្រុមហ៊ុន ~2026-29335-59 (talk) 21:25, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-29335-59

ខ្ញុំអត់ដឹងថាអ្នកកំពុងនិយាយពីអីទេ។ ខ្ញុំអត់យល់ភាសារបស់អ្នកទេ ហើយត្រូវប្រើកម្មវិធីបកប្រែ ដែលវាអាចនឹងមានកំហុសខ្លះ ប៉ុន្តែខ្ញុំពិតជាមិនយល់ពីអ្វីដែលអ្នកកំពុងនិយាយនោះទេ។ ខ្ញុំគិតថាអ្នកប្រហែលជាចូលខុសគេហទំព័រហើយ។ 🍅 fx (talk) 21:27, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

តេីលក្ខណ្ឌប្រេីប្រាស់ដែលត្រឹមត្រូវ តេីខ្ញុំសុំមិនផ្ជាប់អាជ្ញាប័ណ្ណច្រេីនពេកតេីបានទេ ~2026-29335-59 (talk) 21:47, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

តេីគេហទំព័ររបស់ខ្ញុំមានកំហុសអ្វីខ្លះ? ~2026-29335-59 (talk) 21:49, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-29335-59 នេះមិនមែនជា Facebook ទេ។ អ្នកកំពុងចូលខុសគេហទំព័រហើយ។ សូមជ្រាបថា អ្នកអាចប្រើប្រាស់បានតែភាសាអង់គ្លេសប៉ុណ្ណោះនៅលើ English Wikipedia។ ប្រសិនបើអ្នកចង់បន្តសួរសំណួរជាភាសាខ្មែរ សូមទៅកាន់ Cambodian Wikipedia វិញ។ ការបន្តបង្ហោះសារដែលមិនពាក់ព័ន្ធទាំងស្រុងជាភាសាខុសបែបនេះ អាចនឹងធ្វើឱ្យអ្នកត្រូវបានគេរារាំង (block) មិនឱ្យប្រើប្រាស់ទីនេះបាន។

This is NOT Facebook. You are on the wrong website. Please not that you may only use English on English Wikipedia. If you want to continue asking questions in Khmer, please go to Cambodian Wikipedia instead. Continuing to post completely unrelated messages in the wrong language may get you blocked here. 🍅 fx (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

I see that you added the

tag to this page. Is there some specific issue that you'd like to see addressed? Perhaps you could makes some suggestions on the talk page to point us in the right direction. Thanks. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 14:02, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

@Mr swordfish hi, I mostly just thought the article needs general proofreading for grammar, because there were plenty of mistakes; but also, different parts of the list were all in different formats, so rewording them for consistency and uniform style would be great. 🍅 fx (talk) 14:30, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

By --Feliciak.ox (talk) 02:55, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Feliciak.ox, what is your question? 🍅 fx (talk) 02:56, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

After I make an edit, it shows on my contributions page a positive or negative number for example +83 or -12. What does this mean? --ColoursDrippingOff (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @ColoursDrippingOff. That number shows the change in the page size in bytes from your edit. For example, +83 means that you added 83 bytes of text to the page. An English letter is 1 byte, so for English text it's usually roughly the same as the number of letters you added. If the number is shown in bold, it means you added/removed more than 500 bytes. You can also look here for a guide on how to hide those numbers if you don't want to see them. 🍅 fx (talk) 14:46, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! ColoursDrippingOff (talk) 14:51, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! Hope I’m doing this correctly. :)

I’ve been trying to get a better grip on how to do tone revisions and browsed through the NPOV explanation and common objections to it.

One thing I’ve noticed in the suggested tone revisions (and that’s also brought up in the FAQ) is the question of deleting biased content. For a fair few pages with suggested tone revisions, I felt the only real option was to delete near-full sentences (or even paragraphs) rather than attempt to rewrite them, as they seemed to be pretty clearly promotional to me. See for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mimi_Jones&diff=prev&oldid=1355839658 or https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fred_Gruen&diff=prev&oldid=1355097675

Now I know Wikipedia urges its community members to “be bold” but I keep finding myself shying away from tone revisions as it feels rude/intrusive to delete so much text - even if it seems appropriate.

In short I guess my question is: is it common for tone revisions to feel like they need a fair bit of scrapping? --GnarliestTriangles (talk) 17:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @GnarliestTriangles. The changes seem perfectly fine to me, I wouldn't even say you deleted "so much text", I've seen whole article sections being removed because they were entirely promotional. It's not rude to do so at all—the "be bold" rule exists for a reason! The Manual of Style also has a list of words to watch, if you haven't seen it already, it would be pretty useful to check for doing NPOV tone revisions (especially the first section). Removing any sentences that match that list is usually totally fine and only makes the article better (though, of course, apply your judgement). 🍅 fx (talk) 22:05, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello can you take a look at my first article? --Goeirnskd (talk) 01:29, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, mentor! One of the pages I came across as an editor was for American Medical Response. I noticed the Parent page in its Infobox was Global Medical Response, but it redirects to the same American Medical Response wiki page. How would I go about correcting this and building out a new wiki page for Global Medical Response? Thanks! --Meagan.Remmes (talk) 17:50, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Meagan.Remmes! For now, you can just remove the link from the company name in the infobox and leave it as plain text.

To add an article about GMR, you need to edit the redirect page and replace it with the article content. To do that, first click on Global Medical Response. You will see a popup saying "Redirected from Global Medical Response". If you then click on the link in that popup, you will end up on the actual redirect page, which you can edit as you wish.

However! Wikipedia has very strict inclusion criteria for companies. Before attempting to write a new article, make sure you get very familiar with those rules and check whether the company actually passes them. You must also be familiar with Wikipedia's verifiability policy when writing.

There's a chance that the company doesn't meet the inclusion criteria. In that case, the best option is to just leave it as a redirect and remove the link from the infobox of the AMR page. 🍅 fx (talk) 18:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

can i submit a review request for an artical i wrote on my sandbox --Clint O'Shea (talk) 14:49, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Clint O'Shea. There is already an article about the topic on Wikipedia: Russo-Ukrainian war. You can't submit a new article about a topic that already exists.

Since that is a heated political topic, you're only allowed to edit that article directly once you get extended confirmed rights by having some contributing experience. However, if you have some changes you want to make to that article, you can propose them via the Edit request wizard. 🍅 fx (talk) 15:07, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

i wrote a whole brand new artical, again i have no clue where the subbmit button is Clint O'Shea (talk) 15:41, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

@Clint O'Shea I moved your page to Draft:Candidatus Desulforudis audaxviator Subterranean Lineage B and added a submit button. However, please note that using AI to generate any text is strictly forbidden, so your article will most likely be rejected for being AI generated and having almost no citations (In fact, being AI generated is technically a valid reason to just delete your article directly, although I won't do that)

I recommend you contribute to existing articles for a while before trying to write your own, to get some experience first. 🍅 fx (talk) 15:46, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

its not ai, i write on google docs then paste it on the wiki becuse i dont like the layout of the wiki it feels to old Clint O'Shea (talk) 15:49, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

@Clint O'Shea I didn't call it AI because of the formatting, but because the references are completely made up, as well as some of the article titles in the "See also" section. 🍅 fx (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

@Clint O'Shea the new references you just added are still all made up and don't exist. Please stop trying to use AI to generate an article. 🍅 fx (talk) 16:03, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

im not, im using info i randomly find on the web Clint O'Shea (talk) 16:42, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

@Clint O'Shea then you need to cite that info as your source. The sources you currently have are mostly titles of made up articles that don't exist. 🍅 fx (talk) 21:43, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

can you help me write an original article that will probably get accepted because they always deny me --Clint O'Shea (talk) 00:26, 11 June 2026 (UTC)