User talk:Fleyzk

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Fleyzk! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Cjse23 (talk) 17:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

According to the last Toei source, the manga had sold 260M copies, which is the figure that the japanese use in their Wikipedia. FCBWanderer (talk) 12:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Folarin Balogun have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GiantSnowman 08:10, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tien Shinhan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Sakamoto Days, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 16:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dragon Ball GT, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Xexerss (talk) 17:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Ok, but at least let me put the image size on the other three Dragon Ball articles. Why does it bother you so much? It's just better Fleyzk (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Where does that reasoning come from? It seems that you're doing it for personal preference instead of following a WP:MOS or guideline. Xexerss (talk) 18:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Shrek (franchise), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 23:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Shrek (franchise), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. As before, please do not add links to terms that are commonly understood. DonIago (talk) 12:50, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

I mean, spin-off has a link in the introduction of the article. Why don't you let me put a link to it? Fleyzk (talk) 12:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Firstly, I think it's a commonly understood term and probably shouldn't be linked in the lead either, though I wouldn't go out of my way to revert it...however, the fact that it is linked in the lead makes it seem especially unnecessary to link it elsewhere (though granted P&G probably allow for it). But you were also linking other terms, such as DVD, that are certainly more commonly understood. If you'd only linked spin-off I might have left it alone. DonIago (talk) 13:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Ok, I revert my edits in other articles (links to DVDs and sequels). But at least the spin-off links I think they should stay, because I see that there are already in most of the articles. Fleyzk (talk) 13:41, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm fine with leaving those alone. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 13:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Square Enix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Multinational.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Too Much (The Kid Laroi, Jungkook and Central Cee song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Ss112 00:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)

where do you typically grab episode titles for anime, the Kanji and romanization? Just wondering for future reference. ACasualEditor97 (talk) 02:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I'm from Italy so when I search on Google a manga title or an anime title it shows me the articles of AnimeClick, the most important Italian website about manga and anime, which always write the Japanese titles too. But another important and reliable website like that is Anime News Network. Fleyzk (talk) 03:17, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aladdin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Folk tale.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! SKAG123 (talk) 03:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

When you have to repeat a reference, simply assign a name to it in '<ref>', leaving it as '<ref name="[insert name]">' as you can see in this example. You don't have to repeat the reference with each of its parameters. Xexerss (talk) 06:44, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Please see WP:CAPTION. I've left your edits where you've amended a caption that is already not succinct, but reverted those where you've added unnecessary detail. Seasider53 (talk) 10:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Harry Kane. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Per WP:NOTBROKEN. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:17, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

And good to "meet" you. Please be very careful with moves of long-term pages, as you did with Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness (the phrase does not contain a second comma). You should have known that such an important topic had a reason to be presented as it was. Then again, bold moves are allowed. I changed it back, and then went a bit deeper into Wikipedia and fixed some similar errors, so you inspired a few accuracy fixes. Thanks for that. And thank you for having attention on these important topics. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:06, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Cream City brick, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Please restore the American English word to this American article and any other articles where you made the improper change. MarconiCheese (talk) 14:54, 12 August 2025 (UTC)