User talk:Frankbel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hi Frankbel! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Acroterion (talk) 02:16, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Acroterion (talk) 02:16, 25 July 2025 (UTC)
August 2025
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
Frankbel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Just wrote an article on Pariah in Science like Ignaz Semmelweis, Hypatia of Alexandria & Baruch Spinoza (for a local journal) I did conclude a block/ban CAN be constructive. To give the banned some more time.... Hoping I don't have to wait untill I'm dead. :Now, I'm not ready to 'get back in the ring' on the matter, I am preparing a more thought-through approach, based on WP:'s . Therefore I'd like to request an unblock now emotions settled. Won't respond untill my draft is finnished. Frankbel (talk) 18:07, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I've read through this three times and still can't understand what you're trying to say. Ponyobons mots 18:15, 7 August 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Frankbel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
taking the KISS approach, will do my best not to get emotions get in the way. Like the one who banned me calling me a robot, abusing LLM. Again, focussing on message and content, need afew days but in the mean time asking to end the block Frankbel (talk) 17:05, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you:
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:07, 10 August 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.