User talk:Gailar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Long (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by ChrysGalley were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:NAUTHOR - at the moment the sourcing does not confirm notability under the provided definition. There is only one independent source, and relates to a fairly narrow aspect of the subject's career (though it's still a reliable source overall). Linkedin is self published and should not be a source, see WP:RSP. Databases count as primary (sometimes OK, but not for notability) and the other sources are directly connected to the subject. If the submitting editor knows, is, or is in some way connected, to the subject, then this must be declared via WP:COI,
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
ChrysGalley (talk) 12:22, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Gailar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 12:22, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:David Long (British author) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Long (British author). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Much appreciated Robert! Gailar (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Long (British author) (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grapesurgeon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources still don't suggest notability. Many of them are just programs that he's been a cohost of. Need coverage of him as a person; for example the one about him winning a book award counts as WP:SIGCOV, so that counts to notability. Need at least 3 pieces of SIGCOV to pass.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
grapesurgeon (talk) 17:04, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI