User talk:Ganjacrew

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Two Georges Ltd (January 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheTechie was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
In addition, please rewrite this submission to comply with the Manual of Style.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 22:33, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ganjacrew! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 22:33, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Two Georges Ltd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:The Two Georges Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:12, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

January 2026

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Hello Jimfbleak,
this was meant to be a short piece of information about a bristol company, I dont think that it read like an advertisement but I do understand reading further that it didnt meet the notability requirement. Please unblock my account. I wont be making the same mistake going forward.
Thanks GanjaCrew Ganjacrew (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) That is not the proper way to format an unblock request. Please observe these instructions in the block notice:
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TheTechie[she/they] | talk? 23:36, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
thanks hopefully i have done it correctly now Ganjacrew (talk) 22:23, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

icon
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ganjacrew (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

this was meant to be a short piece of information about a bristol company, I dont think that it read like an advertisement but I do understand reading further that it didnt meet the notability requirement. Please unblock my account. I wont be making the same mistake going forward. Thanks GanjaCrew Ganjacrew (talk) 22:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=this was meant to be a short piece of information about a bristol company, I dont think that it read like an advertisement but I do understand reading further that it didnt meet the notability requirement. Please unblock my account. I wont be making the same mistake going forward. Thanks GanjaCrew [[User:Ganjacrew|Ganjacrew]] ([[User talk:Ganjacrew#top|talk]]) 22:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=this was meant to be a short piece of information about a bristol company, I dont think that it read like an advertisement but I do understand reading further that it didnt meet the notability requirement. Please unblock my account. I wont be making the same mistake going forward. Thanks GanjaCrew [[User:Ganjacrew|Ganjacrew]] ([[User talk:Ganjacrew#top|talk]]) 22:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=this was meant to be a short piece of information about a bristol company, I dont think that it read like an advertisement but I do understand reading further that it didnt meet the notability requirement. Please unblock my account. I wont be making the same mistake going forward. Thanks GanjaCrew [[User:Ganjacrew|Ganjacrew]] ([[User talk:Ganjacrew#top|talk]]) 22:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
If you are associated with this company, that must be disclosed per WP:COI and WP:PAID. What edits will you make since you are saying you won't edit about this company further? 331dot (talk) 09:13, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
this page has been deleted so no further edits will be made and I wont be creating any pages going forward. Just correcting any errors i see in the future.Ganjacrew
(Non-administrator comment) Hi! To clarify, could you confirm that this means you are no longer interested in making any edits at all on Wikipedia related to your company? Also, I think it might be helpful to reassure administrators if you'd want to give a more specific example of what an "error-correcting" edit might looks like, if you were unblocked. Best, GoldRomean (talk) 04:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
yes i wont be adding a page for the two georges ltd.
error correcting - if I was to come across information that I knew to be incorrect, I would edit the error and provide a reference. Ganjacrew (talk) 15:18, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI