User talk:Generaluser11
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Generaluser11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Lefcentreright (talk) 15:49, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Mike Rowe (racing)
Hello, Generaluser11,
Thanks for creating Mike Rowe (racing)! I edit here too, under the username Lefcentreright and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Thank you for creating article!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Lefcentreright (talk) 15:50, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Dearborn, Maine moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Dearborn, Maine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Dearborn, Maine

Hello, Generaluser11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dearborn".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:00, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Dearborn, Maine

Hello, Generaluser11. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dearborn".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:00, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
October 2025
Hello, I'm LuniZunie. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Graham Platner, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 22:05, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Your editing history at Graham Platner shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when multiple users repeatedly undo each other's changes on a page to restore it back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Instead of reverting edits, please stop editing the page and discuss on the talk page to create a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a Third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.
If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you break the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if it looks like you intend to continue reverting. Generalrelative (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- I don't respect adding facts to his page and being censored. Generaluser11 (talk) 22:32, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:36, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Why do you have a problem with me pointing out he stands by the crude statement? Because you are a political activist! He clearly said he supports his crude remarks and you are want to promote him! This isn't a website to promote political runners Generaluser11 (talk) 22:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- We can discuss whether his comments should be included in the article at Talk:Graham Platner#Disputed content, but attacking other editors as "trashy" is unacceptable. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Im calling someone trashy, for putting bias into this process and making it about politics. You are creating something out of this, because you support him. He clearly stands by his remark, its a homophobic remark and you know it. If you told someone in a workplace "suck a dick" , HR would tell you not to do that. I Generaluser11 (talk) 22:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- If you think there's an actual issue with my editing, bring it to WP:ANI. Personal attacks and aspersions are unacceptable. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- removing something that directly maps to what he said, citied in a real newspaper IS unacceptable. Its pure political bias. You can't even agree to the neutral crude remake framing I put. Generaluser11 (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Content discussion → Talk:Graham Platner#Disputed content
- Behavior discussion → WP:ANI
- See you at one or both. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:29, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- removing something that directly maps to what he said, citied in a real newspaper IS unacceptable. Its pure political bias. You can't even agree to the neutral crude remake framing I put. Generaluser11 (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- If you think there's an actual issue with my editing, bring it to WP:ANI. Personal attacks and aspersions are unacceptable. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:47, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Im calling someone trashy, for putting bias into this process and making it about politics. You are creating something out of this, because you support him. He clearly stands by his remark, its a homophobic remark and you know it. If you told someone in a workplace "suck a dick" , HR would tell you not to do that. I Generaluser11 (talk) 22:44, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- We can discuss whether his comments should be included in the article at Talk:Graham Platner#Disputed content, but attacking other editors as "trashy" is unacceptable. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:40, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Generaluser11: No more personal attacks. Your outrage at being politely disagreed with is not a license to go after other editors the way I see here and on the article talkpage. Acroterion (talk) 23:57, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- lol Generaluser11 (talk) 14:31, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Continued bad faith and personal attacks by Generaluser11. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:54, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
October 2025

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)I'm back, not the 1st time in my life ive been made an example of.