User talk:Gfcvoice

This article about politics is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by adding missing information.

• v
• t
• e

Category:Political parties in Australia Category:Political parties established in 2014

Hello Gfcvoice,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nick Xenophon Team for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 03:38, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Mackerras pendulum for the next Australian federal election, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Post-election pendulum for the Australian federal election, 2013. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:25, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Gfcvoice,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Miriam Tolan for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 15:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miriam Tolan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miriam Tolan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 13:25, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

See WP:RfC. μηδείς (talk) 00:41, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Gfcvoice. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

timestamp

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barry O'Sullivan, you may be blocked from editing. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, you accused me of "disruptive editing" and "vandalising" Wikipedia. Could you please explain why you believe this to be the case? Gfcvoice (talk) 11:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

You vandalised Barry O'Sullivan for a joke. If you do it again, don't be surprised if you wind up with a block. It is not funny and it is not up for debate. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:38, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Your comments are quite unfortunate. Could I please ask you to review the content of Wikipedia behavioral guidelines, and the manner in which you have addressed me. Specifically, could you please assume good faith and act in a civil manner. Could you please also tone down your language and avoid using ad hominem attacks.

Separate to your conduct, your assertions that I

• "vandalised Barry O'Sullivan"
• (edited) "Barry O'Sullivan for a joke"

are simply untrue. I merely made an edit that you disagreed with. Rather than incorrectly labelling my edits as "vandalism", could you please provide an explanation as to the nature of your disagreement with my edit? Gfcvoice (talk) 11:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Barry O'Sullivan's assertions were intended as a joke at the expense of transgender people. This is clear from even a brief reading of the available sources. While it is *possible* that you made a mistake here, that would be a very silly mistake, so I suggest you drop the grandstanding about assuming good faith. Yaris678 (talk) 12:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

I disagree with your inference made about the intention of O'Sullivan's assertions. The inferences that you are making are not "clear" as you suggest. I stand by my earlier comment about the assumption of good faith, it's unfortunate you've labelled this as "grandstanding". Gfcvoice (talk) 12:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Government shutdown (version 2). Since you had some involvement with the Government shutdown (version 2) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. B dash (talk) 00:10, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

It may be that I have included too much detail (I seem to be the only person adding significant information) or it may be time to split the article. I am asking you because you commented eight years ago when I asked how I was doing.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:32, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Discussion here.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:53, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Yahoo! into Yahoo! Inc. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Gfcvoice,

I recently updated the acquisition list on Kraft_Foods_Inc.. In your first substantial revision in 2015 ( ), you listed three mayonnaise-related acquisitions: Henard Mayonnaise, D. J. Easton^[1], and "2 other mayonnaise companies" for 1929.

I examined many archival newspapers and financial records, but I have not been able to locate any source that mentions "two other mayonnaise companies" acquired by Kraft in 1929. If you remember which source you used, I would greatly appreciate it.

My current hypothesis is that the source you consulted may not have examined the details of the well‑known "10 companies acquisition" in 1929. In your first revision, their sectors were listed as "Cheese, other dairy products," but in fact that group included three mayonnaise‑related companies: Henard, Easton, and Gelfand Manufacturing (whose sector was marked as "n/a" in your revision). Aside from these, I have not found evidence of any additional mayonnaise-company acquisitions by Kraft in 1929. If "2 other" was intended to refer to companies related to Henard and Easton, the only plausible candidates would be Gelfand Manufacturing and John E. Cain^[2]. I have expanded the "10 companies" entry by identifying and adding the companies that were not yet listed individually.

For now, I have added a ^{[citation needed]} tag to the "2 other mayonnaise companies" entry. If you recall the source you used—or think you might remember it later—please let me know. If no source can be identified, I plan to remove that row in about a month.

Thank you very much. Mpsuzuki (talk) 01:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC) Mpsuzuki (talk) 01:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC)