User talk:Girdi45

Hi Girdi45! I noticed your contributions to Clayton Colvin and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 08:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi Tacyarg, Thank You for Welcome message. Girdi45 (talk) 10:43, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi! I see that you've installed this script. Did you try it? Curious what you think about it. Alaexis_¿question? 23:12, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi,

I haven’t tried this AI script yet, but I’m planning to try it as soon as possible. Girdi45 (talk) 09:48, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Just FYI, I created a fork which doesn't require an API key. You can find it here User:Alaexis/AI_Source_Verification. Alaexis_¿question? 11:08, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank You, Alaexis. I'll try this.Girdi45 (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Girdi45, I noticed that you flagged the article Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation as containing AI generated content in your edit/notice [here]. Can you point out what made you conclude that the content was AI? 456legendtalk 13:18, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Yes, the introduction appears to be entirely AI-generated. Girdi45 (talk) 06:42, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

@Girdi45, the content in the intro has been taken from the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation article, since the corporation was split into 3 different municipal corporations. Since, you are of the opinion that it is AI generated content, can you help in fixing the issue in order to resolve the template? 456legendtalk 07:38, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Girdi45, I noticed that you tagged the article Porter (company) with a maintenance template without providing a valid reason in the edit summary. I've reverted it for now. If you have a valid reason, please provide it in your edit summary or at the article's Talk Page. Thanks! Retro music11 (talk) 16:23, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contribution. I have nominated the page for AfD, and you are welcome to participate in the discussion there. Girdi45 (talk) 03:00, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Girdi45, I work as the Wikimedian in Residence at the University of Edinburgh and I notice you have flagged a page edited by one of our students as containing AI-generated content, namely Classic Lolita Fashion. As this was part of an extracurricular project we were supporting the student on we just want to understand how and why the content was flagged in this way. i.e. if it was just immediately and abundantly obvious to the naked eye or if there were some useful tools and scripts employed to aid you (and whether they have been known to flag false positives are are generally reliable). What we are trying to ascertain is how we can better detect and protect against AI-generated content in student work ourselves using any best practice from reviewing editors like yourself and the community and the Foundation. I also want to check that, as the student is a non-native English speaker from China, whether online tools that would naturally have helped her improve her written English fluency would equally be flagged as AI? Any thoughts or advice do let me know. Stinglehammer (talk) 14:22, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Stinglehammer,

Thank You for writing to me. I added AI-generated tag after perform a report on GPTZero which gave 87% probability of AI generated content as a result. However, I understand that such tools are not always fully reliable and may occasionally produce false positives. I think the best way to deal with AI generated content is careful manual review and editing by experienced human editors. To avoid such mistakes in future, articles suspected of containing AI-generated text can be tagged for review and anyone who is expert in the field can rewrite it in a more natural, human-written style. Girdi45 (talk) 13:18, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks very much @Girdi45 - that's super helpful. Stinglehammer (talk) 15:25, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Cool... Happy editing... 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 08:14, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi Girdi45, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:27, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank You. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 05:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, Girdi45. I have deleted Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tibetan Prayer as an attack page under section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion. I realize you filed this over a month ago but we have a bit of a backlog. I have deleted the page because it failed to meet the bare-minimum standard for providing any evidence of wrongdoing, which makes the entire page a personal attack per WP:WIAPA (Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence). For future reference, you may not file an SPI against someone merely because they have created or edited the same page. That is not evidence of sockpuppetry. If it's a new user who shows up to immediately recreate someone else' page, that's one thing; the suspicious behavior of the new account is evidence in its own right. But this SPI concerned multiple users who had been editing for almost 20 years. While we do occasionally catch long-term sockpuppetry like that, it is very rare, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Please be much more careful in the future. This is a warning in my capacity as an SPI clerk, and further issues of this nature may lead to a ban from SPI. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 04:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi Tamzin,

Thank you for the notification. First, I would like to apologize for the situation. I had no intention of targeting or attacking any specific user. This was my first SPI filing, and in hindsight, I recognize that I submitted it without sufficient evidence. I assure you that I will be more careful in the future and will not file an SPI report without strong evidence to support my concerns. 𝓖𝓲𝓻𝓭𝓲➃➄ ✍️ (talk) 12:58, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 00:00, 2 July 2026 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi Girdi45, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:02, 10 July 2026 (UTC)