User talk:Retro music11

Hi Retro music11! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 03:16, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #108888 is closed as successful. -- asilvering (talk) 00:53, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much for investigating this further and clearing the allegation. In addition, I'm I allowed to remove the alleged tag and associated conversation from my talk page? Also, please let me know if an admin will lead the tag on my user page, as it still reflects a certain alleged category. Retro music11 (talk) 10:40, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

You are free to remove any or all current content from this page and from User:Retro music11. The only exceptions are listed in WP:BLANKING, none of which apply here. To be clear, you can also remove this paragraph from me. If you'd prefer, I'm happy to blank your user page. You certainly don't need me to; you can do so yourself, or do so yourself noting that Yamla said it was okay. But sometimes people are happier with admins clearing the sockpuppetry tags. --Yamla (talk) 12:41, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Sorry about that, @Retro music11, I simply forgot. Since I'm seeing Yamla's response before you did, I've restored your old userpage for you. -- asilvering (talk) 12:45, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @Asilvering. Much appreciated! Retro music11 (talk) 15:08, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much @Yamla for clarifying this for me. I'm certainly keeping this paragraph and clearing the rest. Retro music11 (talk) 15:06, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Yamla, a user recently blanked my Talk Page.

DoubleGrazing has reverted the vandalism and restored it to the previous version.

I suspect this vandalism was induced by the same earlier user, engaged in creating different accounts and operating with the same modus operandi. Please let me know how to report these users for a suspected sock puppetry investigation.

Thanks! Retro music11 (talk) 10:54, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

No need, they are already blocked. --Yamla (talk) 10:56, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much for confirming. Retro music11 (talk) 11:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi Retro music11. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! TonyBallioni (talk) 03:32, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

@TonyBallioni Thank you very much! Retro music11 (talk) 16:25, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi Retro music11, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:00, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

@Rosguill Thank you very much! Retro music11 (talk) 18:32, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Retro music11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Technical records from December 2025, indicated that I was a sock of Sahilsambyal. That case was then shifted to Alakmarsaify. Per the same technical records, I was blocked indefinitely by PhillKnight and globally blocked by @Asilvering back then. I was denied access to the Talk page and had to file an appeal under utrs:108888, wherein Asilvering was the Headlining Administrator for the case and they had warned me to carefully stick to one account. I told them - this is the only account I've created and I'm not one of those. I was later unblocked, after being investigated via utrs:108888. Again, today, per technical records, I've been blocked by @Asilvering, stating similar reasons of abusing multiple accounts. This time, a fresh set of users though - Sugar cake11 and StarShineNeutral. Again, I'm restating - this is the only account that I've ever created and have been using. I'm not the master to those users. The first user @Sugar cake11 has O contributions, and was blocked by Asilvering on 7 December 2025. I haven't hijacked that account, nor have I compromised its security. The second user @StarShineNeutral was created on 8 September 2025. I created my account on 14 September 2025. I'm certainly not a master to an account created even before I was on this platform. And, I haven't hijacked that user's account as well. There have been and will be several accounts abusing WP and it's policies. However, every time a new fugitive comes into picture, I'm linked to them per technical records. Throughout my limited experience, I've tried my best to reduce promotional vandalism, reduce possible UPE edits and actively report sock puppets. I fail to understand why @Asilvering thinks I'm abusing these accounts. Or in which manner is my editorial behaviour abusing this platform. Again, I request you to thoroughly check my activity, since you have the tools to do so, while I have a limited ability that allows me to speak for myself, only. It's also my earnest request to not disgrace my editorial integrity, owing to reasons I'm not responsible for. Retro music11 (talk) 13:40, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Technical data now confirmed by three CUs and the behavioral evidence is persuasive. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:31, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser needed voorts (talk/contributions) 00:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

I can confirm the technical match to StarShineNeutral. I will leave the checkuser needed template open in case another checkuser wants to confirm the finding. PhilKnight (talk) 09:46, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

I also confirm the technical match to StarShineNeutral. For other WP:CHECKUSERs, it's easier to start from the StarShineNeutral account. Although I'm only evaluating the technical match, reviewing admins may also want to look at the editor overlap between the two accounts. --Yamla (talk) 11:29, 8 June 2026 (UTC)