User talk:Gotofritz

The article JSHint has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet notability criteria. I can't find any actual reliable articles to back this one up enough. Fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:14, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 14:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC) Thanks Gotofritz (talk) 19:29, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JSHint is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JSHint (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 00:08, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Pizza effect) for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:43, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gotofritz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

By blocking me and allowing DonBaroni to continue editing you have taken sides. I wasn't damaging the content, I was adding useful information.Gotofritz (talk) 16:52, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Per below, nope. Find other articles to work on for a week. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:16, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

First, I partially blocked both you and DonBaroni. Second, edit warring is disruptive even if you are adding useful information. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:54, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

So what is the idea here Firefangledfeathers, you block us for a week, and then ...? Someone has to make a decision whether that paragraph of text DonBaroni keeps removing is useful or not. How does that happen? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gotofritz (talk • contribs) 01:02, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

I see you've already started a dispute resolution noticeboard case, so I'd recommend continuing with that. It looks like it's being held up because you haven't yet notified DonBeroni. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

What do you mean exactly by "you haven't yet notified DonBeroni", I left a reply to his message on the Talk Page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pizza_effect#c-Gotofritz-20251204135000-DonBeroni-20251204134200 Gotofritz (talk) 20:16, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

I was following the lead of the DRN moderator. I believe you're supposed to use a specific template for the notification, as you can see in the DRN instructions at the top of the page. The moderator is now telling you to continue talk page discussion and consider another case if that doesn't work. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 20:35, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

OK thanks for taking the time to reply, it's all so irritatingly byzantine Gotofritz (talk) 20:43, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

You're not wrong! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:00, 11 December 2025 (UTC)