User talk:Grandtubetrains
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is Grandtubetrains's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Croxley Tip (September 25)

- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Croxley Tip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Croxley Tip, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Grandtubetrains!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Croxley Tip (November 17)

- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Croxley Tip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Croxley Tip, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Draft:Croxley Tip

Hello, Grandtubetrains. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Croxley Tip.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
Welcome

Hello, and welcome to the London Transport WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of London's transport system.
There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:
- Starting some new articles? Our Manual of style outlines some things to include. The project also provides templates to help you make the perfect article.
- Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department has rated the quality of every London transport article in Wikipedia.
- Suggest an interesting London Transport fact for inclusion on the Did You Know? section of our portal.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask a fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!
— From the members of WikiProject London Transport
Nomination of Fleet Buzz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fleet Buzz, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleet Buzz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Stagecoach Gold route 1
Hello, Grandtubetrains. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stagecoach Gold route 1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Stagecoach Gold route 1 has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 17:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Glazebrook East Junction–Skelton Junction line, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campaign for Better Transport. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Green Line bus routes 702 and 703, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Windsor.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have corrected this! Grandtubetrains (talk) 12:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:London Buses route 398

Hello, Grandtubetrains. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "London Buses route 398".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:28, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
January 2024

Your recent editing history at British Rail Class 455 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Danners430 (talk) 16:13, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
February 2024
Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 69, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 09:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
