User talk:GregCNI

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Amish Outlaws, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Lorenzo (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by NeoGaze were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
From the provided sources and references, it doesn't appear the subject of this draft is notable enough, particularly as a musician. In addition, sourcing itself is inconsistent; with links to the musician's website, band's websites and discogs. Please add more reliable and independent sources to fully establish the notability of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NeoGaze (talk) 21:59, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, GregCNI! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NeoGaze (talk) 21:59, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dan Lorenzo (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monkeysmashingkeyboards was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 15:41, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the feedback! I am learning as I go. I added a few more reputable sources as references - before I resubmit I wanted to ask if you had any additional suggestions? Thank you again! GregCNI (talk) 01:13, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI