Wikiwand AI

User talk:Greggorrr

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Touchstone Climbing (April 16)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, VortexPhantom, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Touchstone Climbing to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

✓ortexPhantom (talk) 12:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Greggorrr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ✓ortexPhantom (talk) 12:30, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Patch matrix

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Patch matrix, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Use of AI

Hi Greggorrr, and welcome to Wikipedia. Several of your recent edits appear to show signs of AI use. See these diffs as evidence: on Techno, ; on Campus board, ; as well as rapidly created new articles: Patch matrix, Signal routing, High-purity quartz, and Listening bars, all of which have or had issues that can be attributed to LLM use. Using LLMs to create or expand articles is generally prohibited on Wikipedia. Before you continue to edit, please respond honestly, and if I'm mistaken, let me know. StartOkayStop (talk) 21:57, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

I draft in Notion before pasting into Wikipedia because I find the editing experience way easier there, which is probably why my edits appear as large single pastes. And yes, I've also been using Anthropic's claude assistant to help with research, finding sources, and drafting prose, which I then verify and edit before posting. I understand that's part of what triggered your concern. If anything is off, or this is completely not allowed, I am happy to adjust my workflow going forward. Greggorrr (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
I encourage you to read the content guideline at WP:LLM. As it states, using LLMs to generate article content is prohibited, and that appears to be the case with many of your new articles and additions. If you are going to use AI to assist with research, I highly encourage you to take a closer look at everything it generates, including citations, as several of your citations fail verification. StartOkayStop (talk) 22:27, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for the feedback and my apologies for not reading the AI rules ahead of time. I'll study the LLM / AI Wiki guidelines and pivot moving forward. I'll go ahead and fix citations. Appreciate you taking the time to explain and not just flagging. Greggorrr (talk) 22:34, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Signal routing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Signal routing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Signal routing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

-- LWG talk (VOPOV) 17:05, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks