User talk:HLF356

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Filippo Dall'Armellina (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Hlfdalla! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 17:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Filippo Dall'Armellina (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
interviews are not reliable independent sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:34, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Apart from the interview video, which can be cut out if necessary and also adds additional information, the other sources are independent and reliable and contain discussions that arise from interviews. Take Il Gazzettino newspaper or Muscular Dystrophy UK, these are separate sources that yes, mention interviews with the subject, but their articles are the result of interviews and their own research and journalism. MDUK is a UK funding body and charity like the Wellcome trust and Il Gazzettino is the main newspaper in the Northeast Italy and is one of the oldest newspapers in Italy. So this biography is following the Wikipedia guidelines. Giornalista00 (talk) 14:26, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Filippo Dall'Armellina (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Unsure where notability is supposed to lie. What the refs show is that it is in the top 5% of Neuro podcasts - but how do they compare with other podcasts? The sound very niche and, more that one name is listed in the source. The enzyme research does not in itself convey notability. This whole article looks way too soon . This fails WP:GNG and it doesn't help that the refs are poorly formatted , but that isn't a reason for declining the Draft.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 Velella  Velella Talk   15:22, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Filippo Dall'Armellina (November 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ldm1954 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Far, far more is needed. Please do not clog the system by trying to submit again.
Ldm1954 (talk) 13:37, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Filippo Dall'Armellina

Information icon Hello, HLF356. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Filippo Dall'Armellina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI