User talk:HeleneM-Editor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Dog Blue Kat (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Itzcuauhtli11 were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 01:58, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
@Itzcuauhtli11: Thanks for the review. I’ve revised the draft to address notability/neutrality:
– Added independent coverage: Vancouver Sun (2016), Business in Vancouver (2014, 2017), Food in Canada (2022), Canadian Packaging (2022).
– Trimmed promotional wording; removed non-independent sources; kept product launch cited only to editorial trade media (Pet Food Processing, Petfood Industry).
– Clarified the Red Dog Deli corporate name where covered by sources.
I’ve resubmitted—happy to adjust further if needed. HeleneM-Editor (talk) 17:35, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, HeleneM-Editor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 01:58, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red Dog Blue Kat has been accepted

Red Dog Blue Kat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 22:43, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Talk page spamming

Kindly stop adding requests to mention your company on every article related to pet food. It's not going to happen. MrOllie (talk) 00:52, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the guidance. I’m still learning the best practices here, and I’ll step back from suggesting links that could be seen as promotional. If you have advice on the best way to address the “orphan” status of the article, I’d be grateful. HeleneM-Editor (talk) 01:01, 19 August 2025 (UTC)
Please review WP:COI and WP:PAID. Now that the article on your company is in mainspace you should not be editing it directly, particularly not to add promotional text or remove criticism. MrOllie (talk) 18:54, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI