Wikiwand AI

User talk:MrOllie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply clicking the plus sign (+), "New section", or "Add topic" at the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Editwars

I need some people with critical thinking skills to try out User:Polygnotus/Scripts/Editwars. Maybe you are interested? Polygnotus (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2026 (UTC)

Edit the page Emotional Intelligence

Hi, dear MrOllie. Thank you for your comment. First, I need to mention that it is human-written. I didn't use any AI chatbot for this edit. I just read lots of articles on sense and emotion and found that these sentences relate to EQ. When the text is short, it may seem AI-written (I typed the sentences in Word, then copied them to the page. Second, the source is reliable, and the paper has been published in a JCR journal. I tried to enrich the text with new and updated information. I cannot see the problem. Could you let me know what the problem is? Regards. Shiana20 (talk) 12:58, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

See the reply already on your own talk page - you did use an LLM and being dishonest about that will not help. Keep further discussion there, there is no reason to copy and paste your comments here as well. MrOllie (talk) 13:00, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Thank you. Shiana20 (talk) 13:01, 30 August 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The No Spam Barnstar
I've lost track of how many times I've seen an edit in my watchlist that added spam links, only to find that you've already reverted it before me. Thanks for the time you put in keeping those links out of articles! Schazjmd (talk) 15:26, 31 August 2026 (UTC)

Wrongful ban/revert

This information has been fact checked and is true. If you have any questions just feel free to ask. SnowTank0961 (talk) 22:27, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing the page. MrOllie (talk) 22:28, 2 September 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Interactive course

Notice

The article Interactive course has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for needing more references for an astonishing 18 years. It was longer, but spam was cut out in 2023, leaving a dictionary definition.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 00:41, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks