User talk:HenryBarnill

Hello, HenryBarnill, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting Started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, HenryBarnill. You have new messages at Geraldo Perez's talk page.
Message added 04:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Geraldo Perez (talk) 04:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Channel Awesome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holy Terror. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Per WP:ANTAGONIST, we generally don't label characters with such phrases as "protagonist", "antagonist", "main character", "main villain", ETC. DarkKnight2149 21:56, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reese Witherspoon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sing (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

RMaung (WMF) 16:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Midsommar (film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:13, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Before you continue over at Lindsay Ellis, please stop and review all of the sources cited in the article. Also review the WP:BLP policy. Specifically be aware that posting unsourced or poorly sourced negative claims about a living person on any Wikipedia page, whether it's a talk page, user page, or edit summary, is a policy violation and potentially harmful posts are removed immediately.

If I assume you have done due diligence and you have a passing familiarity with Lindsay Ellis, then you must know she spoken out numerous times that she has been the subject of serious harassment countless times. So if you're going to argue that isn't the case, you'd better have very good sources to back it up.. You can't cast aspersions on someone's truthfulness and character on Wikipedia without solid sources. Several reliable sources verify what Ellis has said. No reliable sources dispute it.

You don't have to pay any attention my opinions. Read Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons for yourself and that's all you need to know.

The discussion is at Talk:Lindsay Ellis#Deletion of well-cited facts because an editor "feels" it is minor, but unless you have sources there's not much to discuss. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Dear Evan Hansen seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 20:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Michael Scott (The Office), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:09, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neon (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Abbasi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jodie Comer. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Remember to be careful adding the "minor edit" marker to one of your edit summaries, as you did to your quite significant change to the Succession article. Regards! Professor Penguino (talk) 08:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marx Brothers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aladdin (1992 film).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello Henry. I'm Quaerens-veritatem. I know you've been editing for awhile, and I don't mean to be condescending or ignorant of WP:DTR but, per WP:TR, I encourage you to provide a summary for every edit you make. Of course, the summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history and the summaries help other editors by (a) providing a reason for the edit, (b) saving the time to open up the edit to find out what it's all about, and (c) providing information about the edit on diff pages and lists of changes (such as page histories and watchlists). In case you were unaware, the edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit and a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.

For help in adding edit summaries, see, WP:FIES and WP:EDITSUMCITE.

As you likely know, if the edit is minor, the "This is a minor edit" box can be checked, and a good rule of thumb is that only edits consisting solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of the content may be flagged as minor edits.

Many who are ignorant of the Wikipedia policy on edit summaries fail to add them. Many just ignore this basic brief task; however, failure seems inconsiderate specially since summaries are so easy to add. According to Wikipedia's consensus policy, all edits should be explained, either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page.

Thank you for your attention and for your consideration of our consensus policy. Kind regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 03:27, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to It's a Wonderful Life, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:19, 28 July 2025 (UTC)