User talk:Historyk.ok
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 2025
Your edit to German Colonial Wars has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:22, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- If I make corrections to the text, can I only restore it in a changed form? Historyk.ok (talk) 20:27, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- You can re add that section, but it can't be copied from the source; it'll need to be worded differently, and not too closely phrased. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 17:07, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Moving pages out from mainspace
Today, you moved Assyrian–Kurdish clashes (1895–1900) to Draft:Assyrian–Kurdish clashes (1895–1900). What is your reasoning of moving an establish page to draftspace? Especially when kept at AfD. I see that you moved other pages to the draftspace without purpose so if you persist, I shall report you to an administrative notice board. Thank you. ToadetteEdit (talk) 05:11, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- very poor quality sources, can't even find them, if you have doubts you can check it yourself Historyk.ok (talk) 09:06, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- I see that you have now been blocked. I will revert the moves shortly..... ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:41, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
- maybe you should ask first why I put some articles in "Draft" before you start restoring them? because for example the article Battle of Cahul (1574) already exists only under the name Battle of the Cahul (1574) Historyk.ok (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ohh, my bad. I will redirect it instead. Thanks for noticing. ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- maybe you should ask first why I put some articles in "Draft" before you start restoring them? because for example the article Battle of Cahul (1574) already exists only under the name Battle of the Cahul (1574) Historyk.ok (talk) 22:42, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- I see that you have now been blocked. I will revert the moves shortly..... ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:41, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
June 2025
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- sorry, I didn't know Historyk.ok (talk) 09:30, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Historyk.ok (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Hello, yes @Fajowy this is my second account where I mainly created articles and sometimes made minor changes to other articles. But can I still ask for one last chance? Unfortunately, I know I did wrong, but I would still like to create an article and develop my interests. Now I will really only have one account and definitely no more. Once again, I apologize for the problem caused by this situation and thank you in advance for your answer, have a nice day (I am writing a request from my original account because I was told to write an appeal from this one accounts)
Decline reason:
I'm not sure why you thought it was a good idea to create a new account after pledging here to not sockpuppet anymore. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Historyk.ok (talk) 09:31, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
This appeal was referred here from the sock's talk page. They seem to have added the sleeper account Black Archive (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki · SI) yesterday, now blocked. Izno (talk) 23:47, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know this account, I probably can't even create an account because I have a block but I don't know Historyk.ok (talk) 08:27, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Tamzin @Girth Summit @DoubleGrazing @Izno Hello, I have a question because I was banned for having two accounts, and I would like to ask the following: I sent a request from my account @Historyk.ok, but I saw that one of the users had a very similar situation specifically, I'm talking about Ömereditss. Could we resolve the situation the same way it was resolved for him? It seems like the best solution, but what do you think about it? Historyk.ok (talk) 11:16, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Which situation specifically??? I only see some SPI report while you don't have such SPI subpage. And to be honest, do you absolutely agree to only edit from one account (this one)? ToadetteEdit (talk) 11:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- It's about this situation LGT55 Archive, it seems to me that it is quite similar to this one, but I could be wrong. As for SPI, I don't really know what it is, sorry. I truly promise that I will only have one account. I'm really committed to contributing to Wikipedia, as I had several ideas for creating new articles. Historyk.ok (talk) 12:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- @ToadetteEdit Hi, I saw that you are active so what do you think about it? Historyk.ok (talk) 14:18, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- The SPI report (sockpuppet investigations) is understandable. The user in question lost his password and created other accounts. They were unaware of the sockpuppetry policy, and that is the reason why their other accounts were blocked. Once the user reclaimed their original account, they immediately abandoned the other accounts. Are you experiencing the same issue (lost the password, used other accounts, then recovered the password of the original one and abandoned the others)? ToadetteEdit (talk) 14:33, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- I had a quite similar situation because when I created this account I was logged in on my phone but some time later I wanted to create an article on Wikipedia but on my phone I had some problems with it so I wanted to check how to create it on a computer but I didn't remember the login to this account and that's how the Fajowy account was created and that's why I later used it for the articles but now for a few months I have had the login to both accounts because I found the password saved in my notes. @ToadetteEdit Historyk.ok (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @Ohnoitsjamie okay I won't lie anymore @Black Archive was an account that I created by accident I wanted to check if I can create an account if I have a block and it turned out that yes and once again the account was created by accident as you can see I didn't use it Historyk.ok (talk) 16:21, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- I had a quite similar situation because when I created this account I was logged in on my phone but some time later I wanted to create an article on Wikipedia but on my phone I had some problems with it so I wanted to check how to create it on a computer but I didn't remember the login to this account and that's how the Fajowy account was created and that's why I later used it for the articles but now for a few months I have had the login to both accounts because I found the password saved in my notes. @ToadetteEdit Historyk.ok (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- The SPI report (sockpuppet investigations) is understandable. The user in question lost his password and created other accounts. They were unaware of the sockpuppetry policy, and that is the reason why their other accounts were blocked. Once the user reclaimed their original account, they immediately abandoned the other accounts. Are you experiencing the same issue (lost the password, used other accounts, then recovered the password of the original one and abandoned the others)? ToadetteEdit (talk) 14:33, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- @ToadetteEdit Hi, I saw that you are active so what do you think about it? Historyk.ok (talk) 14:18, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- It's about this situation LGT55 Archive, it seems to me that it is quite similar to this one, but I could be wrong. As for SPI, I don't really know what it is, sorry. I truly promise that I will only have one account. I'm really committed to contributing to Wikipedia, as I had several ideas for creating new articles. Historyk.ok (talk) 12:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Which situation specifically??? I only see some SPI report while you don't have such SPI subpage. And to be honest, do you absolutely agree to only edit from one account (this one)? ToadetteEdit (talk) 11:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Tamzin @Girth Summit @DoubleGrazing @Izno Hello, I have a question because I was banned for having two accounts, and I would like to ask the following: I sent a request from my account @Historyk.ok, but I saw that one of the users had a very similar situation specifically, I'm talking about Ömereditss. Could we resolve the situation the same way it was resolved for him? It seems like the best solution, but what do you think about it? Historyk.ok (talk) 11:16, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Historyk.ok (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Hello, I'll admit it right away, yes @Fajowy and @Black Archive were my multi-accounts, but I'll try to describe why I created these accounts, let's start with @Fajowy it was an account mainly for creating articles and I used this account on my computer. As for @Black Archive, this account was created by accident, I simply didn't know that if I had a ban, I could create an account, and I checked and it turned out that I could, but despite this, I didn't use the account and I wouldn't use it. I know that in the city, 2 accounts are not allowed, I'm sorry, but now I promise that I will not have other accounts and this will be my only one, I really want you to unblock me because I would like to continue creating articles and developing my passions and interests, so once again I apologize and I promise that this was the last time I had two accounts, thank you in advance for your answer)
Decline reason:
As discussed below, your best bet is to take the standard offer and re-apply in 6 months time with no more abuse of multiple accounts or logged out editing. PhilKnight (talk) 00:36, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Historyk.ok (talk) 16:39, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Unless another socket is discovered, I would support an unblock. ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:07, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit: - how do you feel about a possible unblock with a one account restriction? PhilKnight (talk) 03:46, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I see that you asked @Girth Summit about my blockade, but unfortunately I don't know if he will answer you because he has been inactive for almost a month now and there is no point in waiting for his answers @PhilKnight Historyk.ok (talk) 22:25, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Phil. I'm not very active at the moment (new job), apologies for the slow response. From a quick look, I think it likely that they have been evading their block recently by editing anonymously while logged out. Girth Summit (blether) 17:12, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Girth Summit, I have a question: what should I wait for now? 😉 Historyk.ok (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
- Another CU will review your appeal at some point, and come to their own view with regards to the evidence that I looked at. If your appeal is denied, WP:SO is your next step. Girth Summit (blether) 16:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, I have a question, what's next with this case, because for now there is silence @Girth Summit @PhilKnight Historyk.ok (talk) 11:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Someone will be along to review the request in due course - this may take a few weeks, there is a backlog. I expect that they will decline your request, since you have continued evading your block - editing through an IP while your account is blocked is block evasion, which isn't permitted. Girth Summit (blether) 15:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry I used the IP address. I assure you I didn't intend to circumvent the block deliberately or maliciously. My goal was simply to continue working on the articles. I now realize that editing via IP address is considered a bypass, but is there anything I can do to atone for this? I apologize again and admit my mistake. @Girth Summit Historyk.ok (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- I mean, I said in my note above on the 7th of July that I thought it likely you were "evading your block by editing anonymously while logged out", I find it difficult to believe that you thought it was OK. WP:SO is probably your best bet now. Girth Summit (blether) 15:30, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- thanks for your advice... Historyk.ok (talk) 18:06, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I saw that you undid my edits but they were added by some random IP without explanation or sources Battle of Drohiczyn and Hrubieszów Revolution @Girth Summit Historyk.ok (talk) 22:14, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- I mean, I said in my note above on the 7th of July that I thought it likely you were "evading your block by editing anonymously while logged out", I find it difficult to believe that you thought it was OK. WP:SO is probably your best bet now. Girth Summit (blether) 15:30, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- I'm so sorry I used the IP address. I assure you I didn't intend to circumvent the block deliberately or maliciously. My goal was simply to continue working on the articles. I now realize that editing via IP address is considered a bypass, but is there anything I can do to atone for this? I apologize again and admit my mistake. @Girth Summit Historyk.ok (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Someone will be along to review the request in due course - this may take a few weeks, there is a backlog. I expect that they will decline your request, since you have continued evading your block - editing through an IP while your account is blocked is block evasion, which isn't permitted. Girth Summit (blether) 15:18, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, I have a question, what's next with this case, because for now there is silence @Girth Summit @PhilKnight Historyk.ok (talk) 11:38, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
- Another CU will review your appeal at some point, and come to their own view with regards to the evidence that I looked at. If your appeal is denied, WP:SO is your next step. Girth Summit (blether) 16:32, 11 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Girth Summit, I have a question: what should I wait for now? 😉 Historyk.ok (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2025 (UTC)
Question 2025
Hello @Girth Summit, it's been a while but I have a different question than the previous one, so I'm doing it on a different discussion page, but to the point, a few months ago the account of the user User:The Red Archive was blocked and as a result of his blocking, I will delete some of his articles and I have a question if it would be possible to send these articles to my e-mail address German–Hungarian War (1042–1044), German–Byzantine war and Philistine-Israelite wars I would be very grateful Historyk.ok (talk) 15:41, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- I see you've been socking again since our last conversation. I don't know what you mean by saying that you will delete some articles - you are blocked, and not permitted to edit any articles, let alone delete them. I also don't know why you think I would want to engage in an email correspondence with you. Girth Summit (blether) 11:53, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- I think we didn't understand each other, but I understand because my English is not at a high level. I didn't mean "deleting some article" but rather that you send me these articles to my e-mail address. I'm writing to you because you deleted these articles. And why do I need it? Now I want to start working on the Polish Wikipedia and I would love to translate these articles, but I can't because I don't have access to them, so I'm asking you here because as an administrator you have access to them. so can you send them to me now? @Girth Summit Historyk.ok (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- No. Girth Summit (blether) 12:22, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, but I'm asking for a justification for this decision because I had a similar situation and there was no problem, so why don't you want anything now, what's the problem? Historyk.ok (talk) 12:24, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit Historyk.ok (talk) 12:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- When was the similar situation you refer to? Girth Summit (blether) 12:40, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- here is a snippet of a conversation with another administrator with a similar situation on my other account: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1283306011 Historyk.ok (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit Historyk.ok (talk) 13:16, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- That was before you were blocked for abusing multiple accounts, and before you showed your contempt for our policies by repeatedly evading that block. You are going to find people are less willing to do you favours now. Girth Summit (blether) 13:24, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- It's a pity, but I understand your decision Historyk.ok (talk) 13:41, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yet there’s still one thing I don’t understand. I’ve always thought that the role of an administrator is to help others solve their problems, not to emphasize their mistakes or withhold help just because I did something wrong. What will happen if, after some time a few months or even years I regain full editing rights? Will you still remind me of my past mistakes whenever I ask for help? My problem may not be particularly serious, but I’ve always believed that an administrator is someone who can offer a helping hand despite my errors. sorry, I just wanted to mention it.. Historyk.ok (talk) 17:16, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- That was before you were blocked for abusing multiple accounts, and before you showed your contempt for our policies by repeatedly evading that block. You are going to find people are less willing to do you favours now. Girth Summit (blether) 13:24, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit Historyk.ok (talk) 13:16, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- here is a snippet of a conversation with another administrator with a similar situation on my other account: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1283306011 Historyk.ok (talk) 12:55, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- When was the similar situation you refer to? Girth Summit (blether) 12:40, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit Historyk.ok (talk) 12:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, but I'm asking for a justification for this decision because I had a similar situation and there was no problem, so why don't you want anything now, what's the problem? Historyk.ok (talk) 12:24, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- No. Girth Summit (blether) 12:22, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- I think we didn't understand each other, but I understand because my English is not at a high level. I didn't mean "deleting some article" but rather that you send me these articles to my e-mail address. I'm writing to you because you deleted these articles. And why do I need it? Now I want to start working on the Polish Wikipedia and I would love to translate these articles, but I can't because I don't have access to them, so I'm asking you here because as an administrator you have access to them. so can you send them to me now? @Girth Summit Historyk.ok (talk) 12:20, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
regarding “dano-german war of 1227”
I was the person who had written the entirety of the article when it was still a draft. I just want to thank you for finishing the war part and the aftermath part, as I would have never done it myself, I do not read history anymore. that was all, may you have yourself a good life. Anglosaxonmessiah (talk) 16:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)