User talk:Ohnoitsjamie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Talk archives ...

Talk page

OhNoitsJamie Talk

Contacting me

I prefer to communicate via talk pages. Please only email me if there is a good reason not to conduct a conversation on a talk page. I do not respond to emails regarding link deletions and other issues that should be discussed on your userpage or the article talk page.

Why did you remove my external links?

If you've come here because you want to know why I removed some external links you've added, please read Wikipedia's policies on spam, Wikipedia external link guidelines and conflict-of-interest first. wikipedia

PLEASE LEAVE NEW COMMENTS AT THE *BOTTOM* OF THIS PAGE.

Notability references

miscellaneous LTAs trigger on bruce atta campbell

Hi when this filter was triggered I think there was a message saying "don't worry your edits haven't been lost", but the edits haven't been automatically reinstated - do I have to do them again? (And, if I do them again is it going to trigger again!?). Thanks! Ansidhean (talk) 13:32, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Per my response here, the filter has been fixed and shouldn't trigger for you again. I did not reinstite your edits because someone else edited it after the false positive. OhNoitsJamie talk 13:39, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:North Korean Thermonuclear Weapon

Information icon Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North Korean Thermonuclear Weapon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Searchers fix

Nice job setting straight that reference. It's great that some people here know how to do things right. ~2026-15196-07 (talk) 18:55, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me catch the date discrepancy; that's when I noticed the link had rotted. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie talk 18:58, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

WP:NOSALT

I noticed you salted a bunch of draft pages that Timelash socks have been targeting such as Draft:Draft:Jack Massey Welsj and Draft:Mizzy (prankster). Although it prevents them from creating it under the same page again, I don't think it's an effective measure as LTAs like Timelash use work arounds to evade things such as create protection. There are an infinite number of combinations they could use to bypass the salting such as using capital letter instead of lowercase (as create protection is case sensitive), adding another character to it, using letters with accents, and a bunch of other ways. For example, this LTA created Draft:Mizzy, Draft:Mizsy, Draft:Jack Massey WeIsh (with a capital I), and a bunch of other pages which effectively bypass the create protection. It's probably better to use silent alarms than locks as it creates a honeypot page, which makes it easier to catch them. Similarly, thats why LTA usernames usually don't get added to m:Title blacklist as it effectively makes them harder to catch, and it won't prevent them from using another pattern. Another interesting thing about this LTA is that they intentionally misspelled the pages and requested them to be moved to the salted title at WP:RM/TR by using the excuse of a typo. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 23:03, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

True that the salting probably doesn't do much, but that's not my primary method of detection/mitigation. OhNoitsJamie talk 01:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Revert may need to go back further on JASON (advisory group)

@Ohnoitsjamie: I was looking at JASON (advisory group) where you reverted the page due to vandalism. I think the rollback you made restored a version that still contains the problem in the lead. The clean version appears to be the March 23rd version by Pave Paws, before the later edits on May 8th. Would you mind revisiting that page and reverting the lead back to that earlier version? Thanks. LocusAndLeaf (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

@LocusAndLeaf: This revert of a vandal edit was made by LTA Timelash. Per WP:BRV, all edits made by banned users usually get reverted (regardless of whether it's good faith or bad faith) and usually people don't check the content added. But in this scenario, it appears that the sock revert unfortunately restored a bad revision by mistake. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 14:42, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
It seems that Timelash has now started making good faith edits such as reverting vandalism. See also Lznas's contributions. I will note this down on the LTA page. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 15:20, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Yes, that's what happened; thanks for catching that! Fixed. OhNoitsJamie talk 21:27, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
@Prothe1st (talk page stalker) Correct, just remember the end goal is to build the encyclopedia, but good catch. LuniZunie(talk) 00:27, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 18:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I sent you an email about one of your LTA filters, see Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports#Pippo266 for context. Codename Noreste (talkcontribs) 18:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, I made an adjustment to it. OhNoitsJamie talk 13:43, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
It's stormy out there. --Yamla (talk) 18:56, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Ohnoitsjamie. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
LuniZunie(talk) 19:33, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Peters Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Peters Township, Washington County, Pennsylvania, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Kendama

Hello! I’m Mr. racha. I want to know which of the links are inappropriate. I own none of the kendama companies that I linked down below, and unless you provide legitimate reason for removal, they will be added back. These companies are all individually owned and have their own products and services. I want to add them to grow the kendama community (which I have been a member of for 6 years now) and provide people with as much access to kendama as possible.

Thank you! Mr. Racha (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Per WP:EL, Wikipedia is not a link directory. OhNoitsJamie talk 21:38, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Deleted edit

What did I write that was offensive? ~2026-26516-35 (talk) 00:47, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

You attempted to add BLP violating content to Nico Rios. If you do that again, you will be blocked. OhNoitsJamie talk 01:09, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

tool admin

Would you like the ability to impose UTRS bans? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Yes please! I actually had it years ago, but it did not carry over when we migrated to the new system (or maybe it was the prior migration? So many migrations). OhNoitsJamie talk 13:45, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
My pleasure.

can you please explain why this addition is getting blocked? everything is public, and in main media press. It is of public interest and is about Reproductive coercion.

@Ohnoitsjamie

Please can you explain why the below is being blocked? it is about reproductive coercion. And is of public interest. Has been spoken about in multiple newspapers and also in Parliament debates - which have been publicized. Proposed wording is below again.. Multiple MPs have spoke about Olivia Nervo's case within parliament/ Thanks

Please discuss it on the article's talk page. OhNoitsJamie talk 12:28, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
Close

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI