User talk:Humblejones

I won't ask twice. Simonm223 (talk) 16:14, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

uh oh big bad internet dude! Humblejones (talk) 16:15, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

grrr you wont like it when im angry AWOOOOOOO i turn into the wolf man!!! roof roof roof bark bark AWOOOOO Humblejones (talk) 16:16, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

you made the reversion from your other account Auslondonner get canary trapped doofus Humblejones (talk) 16:18, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

exposed for alt-fixing mutliple alt accounts spamming an article to control it? not very humble jones of you.... Humblejones (talk) 16:19, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

No that's called a page-watcher. Please adhere to WP:NPA I think this is all that needs to be said. Simonm223 (talk) 16:20, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

you are personally attacking me with your alts! i should report you for being a vandal and removing clearly referenced content! Humblejones (talk) 16:22, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The following items are some examples which would make someone a disruptive user:

Creating disturbances on featured article candidate pages, e.g. objecting just to object

please see WP Disruptive Users I think is all that needs to be said. Humblejones (talk) 16:25, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Editor WP:NOTHERE, engaging in vile personal attacks. AusLondonder (talk) 16:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Dimes Square. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing.   MetalBreaksAndBends   (talk) (contribs) 16:36, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Augmented Seventh (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Justin LaPuff, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 16:57, 23 February 2026 (UTC)