User talk:INeonFox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi INeonFox. Thank you for your work on Ukraine at the 2026 Winter Paralympics. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability as per WP:NSPORT. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a good day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Mariamnei (talk) 07:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Mariamnei: Hi! Thank you for your message. I will add the references to the results shortly and republish it. Though I have a question - I usually don't add any references to the results, because I noticed that most of any sport pages just don't do it generally, and obviously it's just a hastle. There are occasional one or two refs, but rarely a detailed ref sheet. Same with other Paralympic nations' pages. So then, what would be the norm? Considering the WP:NSPORT, aren't most of the sport pages like that? Of course again, there are some exceptions with well written out articles, but most pages have only a few sentences, and some tables. I would assume those pages would be a stub, rather than questioning their existence, but please feel free to let me know if I'm incorrect. Have a good day! INeonFox (talk) 08:47, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for writing to me. In general, everything in the encyclopaedia should be sourced. In practice, sometimes we are a little lax on that, and it could be we are especially lax regarding sports (it's not really my subject area, so hard for me to say). In terms of notability, it is generally accepted that almost anything with significant coverage in 3 reliable, independent, secondary sources meets the notability requirement. I hope that is helpful. Have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2026 (UTC)