User talk:IOnlyKnowFiveWords
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
United States presidential election, 2020
You reverted my edit regarding Oprah not being listed under the GOP list of potential candidates, citing a CNN/SSRS poll purportedly showing her reaching 1% support amongst likely GOP voters, which is "more than Ted Cruz, Mitt Romney, ..." etc. I looked up the poll and this is false. She was listed as "Oprah Winfrey, the Democrat" and it was not for a GOP primary, it was for a general election against Trump. Please cite your source next time.
Source: http://cdn.cnn.com/cnn/2018/images/01/23/rel1e.-.2020.pdf
- @TheBaronDe: It's funny that you ask me to cite my sources when the source is literally cited right on the actual page, next to Winfrey's name. It's ref number 73 and it's actually THIS poll from March, not the one you cited from January. She shows up on page 5/14, it is question number 22 and reads as follows:
- "While we know it is early and most candidates have not announced their candidacies yet, which candidate in particular would you prefer to see the Republican Party nominate for president instead of Donald Trump in 2020?"
- Oprah Winfrey is listed with 1% support, below Ted Cruz and above Trey Gowdy, both with 1% as well. IOnlyKnowFiveWords (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
United States presidential election, 2020
You recently added polling info for declined candidates. Can you explain how this is helpful? Brian Everlasting (talk) 14:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- I seriously don't understand the argument that polls including declined candidates should be disregarded. People change their minds. John Kasich, Mark Cuban, and Joe Biden have both gone back and forth on whether or not they would run just in the last six months. Cory Booker and Andrew Cuomo have "declined" by saying they'll focus on their respective reelection campaigns. As I've already explained on the talk page: In 2013, early general election polls for 2016 included Joe Biden, Andrew Cuomo, Howard Dean, John Kerry, Elizabeth Warren, Sarah Palin, and Paul Ryan. Polls are useful information, period. They should not be excluded just because they feature a likely speculative candidate that has declined three and a half years before the election. IOnlyKnowFiveWords (talk) 15:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- If the candidates are worth considering they shouldn't be classified as 'declined', they should be speculative. A candidate shouldn't be on both 'declined' and polls at the same time. Brian Everlasting (talk) 16:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- According to whom? This is the way it's always been done. These are hypothetical polls. IOnlyKnowFiveWords (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- If the candidates are worth considering they shouldn't be classified as 'declined', they should be speculative. A candidate shouldn't be on both 'declined' and polls at the same time. Brian Everlasting (talk) 16:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
United states election 2020
You recently reverted one of my edits stating i misread the rules.
This is what the rules say:
===Candidates who have publicly expressed interest=== Candidates in this section have expressed an interest in running for President within the last six months. ***Candidates in this section only need one source ***Sources in this section can go back a maximum of six months ***Sources should be from after the 2016 Presidential Election ***Candidates in this section should not have expressed interest via social media
I read the rules correctly. Candidates who have publicly expressed interest only need one source. Crewcamel (talk) 01:52, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- You seem to be omitting the part where it says that they should have between 1 and 3 sources...
===Candidates who have publicly expressed interest=== Candidates in this section have expressed an interest in running for President within the last six months. ***Candidates in this section only need one source ***Sources in this section can go back a maximum of six months ***Sources should be from after the 2016 Presidential Election ***There should be one to three sources for a potential candidate ***Candidates in this section should not have expressed interest via social media
- It specifies that the section "only needs" 1 source, since the other sections require at least 2. I see no point in removing sources that aren't excessive (3 is certainly not excessive by the way, since most candidates on the page already have 3). IOnlyKnowFiveWords (talk) 02:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
You are now an extended confirmed user

Hi IOnlyKnowFiveWords. If you haven't noticed, you have become an extended confirmed user, as you have made at least 500 edits, and your account is older than 30 days. This grants you to edit pages with extended confirmed protection. Happy Editing! Also congratulations on making 500 edits! Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 02:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Ref issue
I have fixed the issue you raised here. I went to the template's talk page for help. Here is the response I got. Callmemirela 🍁 talk 21:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm not super well-versed in Wikipedia language. I learn as I go, I suppose. IOnlyKnowFiveWords (talk) 21:35, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
WP:1RR warning
Hey, WP:1RR applies to the United States presidential election, 2020 article so please remember to not do more than one revert within 24 hours. Prcc27 (talk) 04:37, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

