User talk:Ibrohard

A tag has been placed on User:Ibrohard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under not even a shred of competence because the page appears to be very interesting and funny. Please note that Wikipedia is a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for high quality pages, such pages may be praised at any time.

If you think this page should be deleted for The Reason, you may not be a perfect person, then you should click the button labelled "self destruct" on your computer. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you have a reason to live. However, be aware that no one is listening to you, and your computer may blow up without delay. Please do not remove the "LOL xD hilarious page" tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information however you'd like. No rules. If the page is deleted, and it's all your fault, then please kindly screw off, and if you have already done so, then screw on. here. CptViraj (📧) 16:55, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ibrohard! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! SilkTork (talk) 15:44, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Ibrohard. I noticed that you changed the band names in Jangle pop from "the Byrds" to "The Byrds". This is quite understandable, and though I was one of those who voted for the lower case "the" in the RfC on this matter many years ago, I think it would be better if we did use a capital "The". However, per MOS:THEBAND, the house style on Wikipedia is to use a lower case "the". There's nothing for you to do, as I have fixed the names. But it's something worth knowing, so when you see an article like The Beatles you are aware that the lower case "the Beatles" is not a mistake! Any questions, you can ask me on my talkpage any time. Regards, SilkTork (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello SilkTork. I really appreciate your message! I actually did not know this, and I had just assumed it was a typo. My bad. Ibrohard (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:33, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

please read WP:BLP, it applies to talk page as well. User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 21:31, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

In addition to the above, accusing subjects of making "defamatory statements" could be construed as a veiled legal threat. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:38, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

How is it a legal threat. I'm not ethan klein, I'm not gonna sue her. Ibrohard (talk) 21:51, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Ok, thank you. Ibrohard (talk) 21:51, 20 December 2025 (UTC)