User talk:Isolatedchimpanzee

Hi Isolatedchimpanzee! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Wikikreator, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 04:59, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

I have no Idea why you would think it is AI created? Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 11:23, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 02:03, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

I have no Idea why you are telling me this. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 02:25, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Because you are citing blogs and deprecated sources. MrOllie (talk) 02:38, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

I maybe, let's say, such as? Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 03:00, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

I believe MrOllie is referring to the Medium blogs you had cited. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 04:23, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

Yes, but does it means to remove all the other claims? He removed other too including on which Medium are not used? Moreover, we generally put ^{[unreliable source?]} tag on the sentence or pages where we feel disapproval, or fix it. He seems to revert it back and back again. Thats warring. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 04:28, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

He is deliberately wasting my time. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 04:29, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

All text added to articles must be supported by a reliable source. As with our colloquy on the article talk page, claims there are general practices not being followed by editors who disagree with your attempts to add poorly cited material are belied by (1) your failure to cite any relevant policies, guidelines, or other evidence of consensus that support your decision, and (2) your short edit history that renders incredible any claim to know about an undocumented general practice.

With regard to deprecated sources, you also added a Forbes Contributor article (and re-added it even if you for some reason don't accept that's what happened when you undid its removal).

With respect to the comment about time wasting, please read WP:AGF and strike your comment. There are dispute resolution processes for genuine bad faith behavior, but accusing other editors of bad faith on a talk page can lead to a suspension of editing privileges. Oblivy (talk) 05:07, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

The article Wikikreator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:09, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

The article was created from requested articles pages. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 11:27, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wikikreator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikikreator until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:19, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

If there is a problem at Singular matrix, the place to ask is at its talk page, Talk:Singular matrix. If that doesn't get attention, the next step would be to notice the wikiproject discussion link at the top of the talk page, then ask there. That link is Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Johnuniq (talk) 03:42, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

the problem is not specifically at the Singular Matrix's article page. The code of matrix is broken everywhere, I tried in a singer's article. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 03:46, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind that I rolled back your edits that corrupted the Help Desk page. Please resubmit your request. Thanks. Art Smart ^Chart/Heart 03:48, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

No, I already had panic from that syntax error. I maybe try later if issue is fixed, just going to try village pump for now. Thanks. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 03:50, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Agentic AI, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:45, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Update: You added a title that does not exist in the article. I have reverted your edit. Oblivy (talk) 09:57, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

That might have been an error. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 10:56, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

an advice. If you feel that some certain part of the article has a mistake like having an incorrect title, link or other aspect, best action should be to explore a little bit and fix it by yourself. Removing a bulk of edit shows that you do not have skill to fix issues. Next time just go to the link and fix the title rather than bulk revert my edit and tell me. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 11:02, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

I appreciate your comment, and in some circumstances yes I'd make the edit. On the other hand, it was not done correctly in the first place, these were your citations and your text, so better you re-add them. It is easy enough for you to restore the edit in correct form. Sorry if you feel this was not the right approach here. Oblivy (talk) 14:32, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Whatever. Isolatedchimpanzee (talk) 14:42, 26 August 2025 (UTC)