Your submission at Articles for creation: GEOX AI (May 2)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Minnastronomer, left the following feedback:
Not enough information given in article compared to the excessive sources. Four sentences and ten sources is not a good ratio.
Next steps
Edit Draft:GEOX AI to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Hello, Jacmis872!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Minnastronomer (talk) 10:14, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for taking the time to review the draft and for the feedback. Based on your suggestion regarding the imbalance between the number of references and the amount of content, I have expanded the article substantially and improved its structure with additional sections covering the overview, technology, and applications of GEOX AI.
The draft is no longer limited to a short single-paragraph description, and I have also adjusted the wording to maintain a more neutral encyclopedic tone.
I would appreciate it if you could review the updated draft again when possible:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:GEOX_AI
Thank you once again for your guidance and review. Jacmis872 (talk) 10:20, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: GEOX AI (May 3)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, Tacyarg, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
The sources here are based on what the company had said about this product. We need reliable independent coverage. Of the specific sources: LiveLaw reads promotional and there is no byline for this article. Sikkim Express is a deadlink, and I cannot find an archive. tv5news reads promotional and only has a partial byline. Vartha Bharati is based on what the company said: "TraceX Labs has announced"; the article has no byline. Similarly Gujarat Samachar. There are no sources here where actual named writers who have subject expertise about this area analyse the product.
Next steps
Edit Draft:GEOX AI to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppetthat was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:44, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
