User talk:Janknand

Please take greater care in adding wikilinks. I've had to revert numerous inappropriate wikilinks you have added. You must confirm whether the wikilink is in context with the content being described. For example, in the article Werther (Colin Davis recording) about a musical album released in 1981, you wikilinked the term "absolute pleasure'- used within a quote - to a 2012 album titled "Absolute Pleasure" by the Detroit rock group Electric Six. There is absolutely no relationship here. The term was used as a descriptor in a quote, not as a mention of an album that wouldn't exist for another thirty years, that has nothing to do with the Opera the article is about.

This is a common problem; please ensure that your wikilinks are accurate and appropriate before committing them to the public encyclopedia. Please do not wikilink words that are within a quote - quotes must be presented exactly as written, without modifying the content with wikilinks. Thank you. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 18:44, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

I will take special care from now on. Thank you. Janknand (talk) 05:18, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

You are again making inappropriate links. I suggest you find some other way to be productive. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, sir. It appears that I approved it without properly checking whether the links were appropriate. I will make sure to review such details more carefully in the future, and this will not be repeated Janknand (talk) 17:35, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. You moved several drafts into main article space. Please don't do this. I have moved these all back to the draft namespace. If you want to help finish and review drafts so that they can be full articles, please join WP:AFC. In particular, there are certain requirements that reviewers look for and standards that should be adhered to. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Palmy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 14:09, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok Sir. THANK YOU Janknand (talk) 14:21, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Karate Akhtar, you may be blocked from editing. UtherSRG (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Respected Sir @UtherSRG,

The draft lacks references, so a detailed review is unnecessary. As you can see, there are already more than 3,800 pending reviews, and handling such AFC submissions only consumes valuable time. My intention was simply to assist editors and reviewers. However, I will be more mindful of this going forward.

Thank You. Janknand (talk) 17:24, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

That wasn't even what you did. You moved it from Draft to Draft talk, and then back again. Please don't even do that. You are being disruptive. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok sir. Thank you Janknand (talk) 01:38, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Janknand, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Help is available: check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask your mentor via your user homepage, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! UtherSRG (talk) 17:13, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft talk:Mukesh Mishra. UtherSRG (talk) 15:01, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Why sir ? What i did which is not accepted by Wikipedia guidelines, could you please point out... Janknand (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

You used LLM to make an assessment. That is not allowed. Another user has hidden your comment. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:45, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Sir, Llm used just to correct grammar error only. It's doesn't mean that it's offensive activity or did anything blunder, it's just used in draft talk page. However from next time i will be keep in my mind . Thanks Janknand (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Can you tell us what is your interest in and/or relationship with Mishra? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:05, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Sir, I encountered this submission randomly. I chose to review it as the subject relates to the Mithila region. Janknand (talk) 17:28, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

I told you previously to read the requirements for joining WP:AFC, and to stop being disruptive. Your continued willful ignorance of our processes and policies says you aren't here to build an encyclopedia. - UtherSRG (talk) 23:06, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Ok sir. My intention to only help the editors as you can see the reviewers give review once in month or more than months. Which can increasing the number of pending afc. However, i will maintain the Wikipedia policies if this kind of activity is against the guidelines. Thanks Janknand (talk) 04:18, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

As I said previously, ...there are certain requirements that reviewers look for and standards that should be adhered to. You have obviously not read or understood those requirements. If you wish to aid in reviewing drafts, you should request to join WP:AFC. Otherwise, please stop being disruptive. Dealing with disruptive behavior takes away from the productive tasks, like reviewing drafts; so your actions are actually making the reviews of drafts take more time. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:50, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

@Janknand: care to tell us the point of this: Special:Diff/1348445962? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:51, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Sir, That is just the usual AfC acceptance notice being added. Janknand (talk) 19:07, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

After being warned to not mess around with WP:AFC? I've now flagged you to the admins to have your editing privileges suspended. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:59, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Do you operate both this user account and Yogiin? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:45, 13 April 2026 (UTC)