Wikiwand AI

User talk:Jbentley86

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Jbentley86, welcome to Wikipedia! I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:S.D. Holman to Articles for creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia. We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

If you have general editing questions, the Teahouse is where you can seek help from experienced editors. Questions about the draft creation and publishing process should be directed to the Articles for creation Help Desk instead, where you can get assistance directly from reviewers. Don't hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome  I hope you enjoy your time here! cyberdog958Talk 17:31, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:S.D. Holman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:S.D. Holman. Thanks! bonadea contributions talk 14:34, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: S.D. Holman (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Devonian Wombat were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 20:37, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jbentley86! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 20:37, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: S. D. Holman (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The subject is definitely notable and I think the tone issues can easily be fixed, but too much of this draft is currently unsourced and unsupported by your references. For instance, the entire "Early life and education" section is currently unreferenced. Every claim in this draft should ideally be either supported by an inline citation to a reliable source, or else removed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MCE89 (talk) 03:19, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Paul Bellini

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Paul Bellini, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Mouth Congress

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mouth Congress, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:03, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mouth Congress (Band) (April 10)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Cmajorftw, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for music. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Mouth Congress (Band) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Cmajorftw 19:06, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: S. D. Holman has been accepted

S. D. Holman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 09:13, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mouth Congress (band) has been accepted

Mouth Congress (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ca talk to me! 03:30, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks