Wikiwand AI

User talk:Jknacnud

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome, from Journalist

Welcome!

Hello, Jknacnud, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Journalist C./ Holla @ me!

@Journalist, thank you for the welcome and the helpful information. Jknacnud (talk) 17:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SmartyLLC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SmartyLLC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris talk! 21:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SmartyLLC (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 17:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jknacnud! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 17:02, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:SmartyLLC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:SmartyLLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toarin (talk) 11:57, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Reply

Not a reason for deletion, but the draft title should not be SmartyLLC or even Smarty LLC, since we don't accept standard descriptors like Ltd, LLC, Pvt, AG or similar. Smarty (company) would be appropriate. Also headings should be in sentence case.

Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:

  • you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
  • Most of your sources appear to be press releases or interviews with your bosses rather than genuine independent third-party sources, and others appear to be just local media outlets rather than nationally or international reputable sources.
  • The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
  1. significant coverage in
  2. independent,
  3. multiple,
  4. reliable,
  5. secondary sources.
Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
  • There is little about the company itself other than a location. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits. You give an employee range of 125–399 , but that isn't verified by its reference.
  • You claim "recognition", but neither the awarding bodies nor the awards are linked to Wikipedia articles, which raises questions about their significance, and in any case a state-level award isn't really notable enough.
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • As I said before, there is little about the company itself, but lots of poorly sourced claims. So your supposed contributions to NIL for women are either direct quotes from the company leadership or press releases, whereas such claims need independent reviews rather than "we did this" with no proper evidence that you did.
  • Similarly, most of your "applications" seem to be sourced to press releases or interviews.
  • There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • You had one that should heve been a reference.
  • You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
I didn't check.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. I've seen worse, and I'm prepared in principle to restore as a draft. You will need to give real facts about the company to establish notability, and remove or properly validate the Contributions to NIL claims. Because of your COI, you mustn't move your draft to article space yourself, you must submit for review. Let me know how you wish to proceed Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:53, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

This has been a process. The page started in the article space, got deleted, I moved it to the Draft space, reviewed and rejected, now it was deleted out of the draft space also. Is there no place I can just leave it to keep working on it without worrying that someone else is going to feel the need to delete it? I have mentioned in the Draft talk page that I have no intention of submitting it to the general article space, ever, because of my conflict of interest. If someone else would like to submit it at some point, that is fine. If it never gets submitted, that is also fine. I would just like some place where I can keep collecting data and putting it together. Perhaps Wikipedia is not that place. In any case, can I please have all the contents back? I did not have a backup copy of all the links and other contents that were on the Draft and Talk pages. Jknacnud (talk) 21:38, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
It's just chance I came back here. If you leave a message on this page, and I will only know you have done so if you start it with my user name, User:Jimfbleak and sign it with four tildes ~~~~ when you post it. That will send me an alert. I'll restore the page at Draft:Smarty (company) in a few minutes Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:31, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
There is nowhere on wikipedia that is not visible. There is nothing to stop your draft being nominated for speedy deletion again, so either improve as above or take a copy asap. also note that drafts won't be hosted indefinitely, they will be deleted six months after the laste edit. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:39, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
User:Jimfbleak,
I appreciate you restoring the page. I have now copied the contents. I will work on it elsewhere. You may delete it again.
Thank you,
Jknacnud (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Smarty (company)

Information icon Hello, Jknacnud. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Smarty (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks