Wikiwand AI

User talk:Khakbaz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Howdy, Khakbaz, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.


Additional tips

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

Be Bold!!

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

Joe I 14:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SilkPage

Notice

The article SilkPage has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Collibra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Collibra requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Finngall talk 17:22, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Collibra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Collibra, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MediaKyle (talk) 23:55, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Collibra

Hi. I've moved the article to draft so it can be reviewed before it goes into mainspace. This is desirable because of the previous deletion discussion, which was not all that long ago. Deb (talk) 10:14, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Excellent idea, to have the Collibra article reviewed prior to publication. Looking forward to your guidance and support in the future as well. For your information, my work on this article and the wider Data Governance category is version-controlled here:
https://github.com/sindoc/datatech-wiki-kg Sina K. Heshmati (SinDoc) (talk) 11:17, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Collibra (May 2)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Pythoncoder, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Collibra to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 09:54, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for your time. LLMs only for formatting have been used and not for authoring the content. I have presented my case as a topic under your page. Apologies for duplicating. I see now on my talk page that I should have simply responded here on this very page, as opposed to the following: (?)
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APythoncoder#LLMs_were_used_to_format_the_content Sina K. Heshmati (SinDoc) (talk) 12:43, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Khakbaz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 09:54, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Collibra (May 23)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Theroadislong, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.
GPTZeros says 100% AI generated

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Collibra to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Theroadislong (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Okay. Thank you for the feedback. My argument was that AI has been used to build the machinery behind maintaining the content of this article over time. Do you want me to commit the wiki content into the source repository and provide a link to github? Would that help? Sina K. Heshmati (SinDoc) (talk) 15:46, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
I have no idea what you are suggesting here and why the confusing hidden user name? The draft needs to be re-written WITHOUT the uase of AI. Theroadislong (talk) 16:00, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Collibra has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Collibra. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:45, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Any feedback regarding the content of a response to the compilation argument would be highly appreciated. If there's already an answer, feel free to share the corresponding link.
If I'm missing something, please provide context here. Sina K. Heshmati (SinDoc) (talk) 15:48, 23 May 2026 (UTC)


I love this response:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#c-Meadowlark-20260523153800-Khakbaz-20260523152900 Sina K. Heshmati (SinDoc) (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks